首页> 外文期刊>Leprosy review >Sensitivity and specificity of traditional testing methods to detect sensory impairment in the skin lesions of leprosy compared to Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments
【24h】

Sensitivity and specificity of traditional testing methods to detect sensory impairment in the skin lesions of leprosy compared to Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments

机译:与Semmes-Weinstein单丝相比,传统测试方法检测皮肤病皮肤病中感觉损伤的敏感性和特异性

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of traditional testing methods to detect sensory deficit in the skin lesions of leprosy in comparison to Semmes Weinstein (SW) nylon monofilaments. Design: After ethical clearance and written informed consent from study subjects, a consecutive series of 50 patients aged 12 years with leprosy skin lesions, who attended our institution, were evaluated in this cross sectional study. Results: 74 skin lesions of 50 patients were evaluated. Considering the monofilament test result as the gold standard, the sensitivity to detect sensory impairment was 95.9% for the ballpoint pen, 97.3% for a sterile needle and 100% for cotton wool, and cold and warm water. Limitation: Paucity of cases in the lepromatous spectrum of disease and the probable absence of early lesions of disease in the study group were the study limitations. Conclusions: The cotton wool and ballpoint pen methods are easy to perform in the field and have comparable sensitivity and specificity to the blue Semmes Weinstein nylon monofilament to detect sensory impairment in skin lesions, especially in tuberculoid cases.
机译:目的:确定传统检测方法的敏感性和特异性,以检测麻风病皮肤病患者的感觉缺陷与Semmes Weinstein(SW)尼龙单丝相比。设计:在研究受试者的道德清算和书面知情同意之后,在这一横断面研究中评估了在患有我们所机构的麻风病皮肤病的50名患者中的连续50名患者。结果:评价75例患者的74个皮肤病变。考虑到单丝测试结果作为黄金标准,圆珠笔检测感觉损伤的灵敏度为95.9%,无菌针的97.3%,棉羊毛100%,冷热水。限制:缺乏疾病疾病谱的缺乏和研究组中疾病早期病变的可能性是研究限制。结论:棉羊毛和圆珠笔方法易于在现场进行,对蓝色SEMMES Weinstein尼龙单丝进行相当的敏感性和特异性,以检测皮肤病变中的感觉损伤,尤其是结核病病例。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号