首页> 外文期刊>Nursing Open >Intervention study of a foot‐care programme enhancing knowledge and practice among nurses and care workers at in‐home service providers
【24h】

Intervention study of a foot‐care programme enhancing knowledge and practice among nurses and care workers at in‐home service providers

机译:跨护理方案的干预研究加强家庭服务提供者护理工作者的知识和实践

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim To evaluate the foot‐care educational programme for nurses and care workers at in‐home service providers. Design A non‐randomized controlled study with random cluster sampling method. Methods Study participants were nurses and care workers of 21 in‐home service providers, including home‐visit nursing and care providers, 1‐day care service centres or care centres with rehabilitation programme in Japan. Foot‐care programme with foot‐care tools as a package or standard care comprising 3–5 sessions over 2?months was provided to 110 participants?(87 were on analysis). The outcomes were changes in foot‐care knowledge and scores in pre–post interventions. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics, t test, logistic regression analysis and ANCOVA. Results Before adjusting for background, total scores of?knowledge and practice categories were higher than the baseline in the intervention group (43 participants) compared with the control group (44 participants). After background correction?due to potential bias of non‐random cluster sampling, significant between group differences were observed in mean score changes in?skin and consultation subscales of the practice category.
机译:旨在评估家庭服务提供商的护士和护理工作人员的脚踏教育计划。用随机簇采样方法设计一个非随机控制研究。方法研究参与者是21家内部服务提供商的护士和护理工作者,包括家访的护理服务提供商,在日本的康复计划为期一日护理服务中心或护理中心。带有足部护理工具的脚护理程序作为包装或标准护理,包括超过2个月的3-5个月,到110个月?(87在分析上)。结果是在发布前干预措施中的脚护理知识和分数的变化。通过描述性统计,T测试,逻辑回归分析和ANCOVA分析数据。结果在调整背景之前,与对照组(44名参与者)相比,学术总数?知识和实践类别高于干预组(43名参与者)中的基线。在背景校正之后?由于非随机簇采样的潜在偏差,在平均分数变化中观察到群体差异之间的显着性,练习类别的咨询分量。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号