IntroductionThe creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation was calibrated for the general Pakistan population (eGFRcr-PK) to eliminate bias and improve accuracy. Cystatin C–based CKD-EPI equations (eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys) have not been assessed in this population, and non-GFR determinants of cystatin C are unknown.MethodsWe assessed eGFRcys, eGFRcr-cys, and non-GFR determinants of cystatin C in a cross-sectional study of 557 participants (≥40 years of age) from Pakistan. We compared bias (median difference in measured GFR [mGFR] and eGFR), precision (interquartile range [IQR] of differences), accuracy (percentage of eGFR within 30% of mGFR), root mean square error (RMSE), and classification of mGFR?<60 ml/min/1.73 m2(area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] and net reclassification index [NRI]) among eGFR equations.ResultsWe found that eGFRcys underestimated mGFR (bias, 12.7 ml/min/1.73 m2[95% confidence interval {CI} 10.7–15.2]). eGFRcr-cys did not improve performance over eGFRcr-PK in precision (P?= 0.52), accuracy (P?= 0.58), or RMSE (P?= 0.49). Results were consistent among subgroups by age, sex, smoking, body mass index (BMI), and eGFR. NRI was 7.31% (95% CI 1.52%–13.1%;P?< 0.001) for eGFRcr-cys versus eGFRcr-PK, but AUC was not improved (0.92 [95% CI 0.87–0.96] vs. 0.90 [95% CI 0.86–0.95];P?= 0.056). Non-GFR determinants of higher cystatin C included male sex, smoking, higher BMI and total body fat, and lower lean body mass.ConclusioneGFRcys underestimated mGFR in South Asians and eGFRcr-cys did not offer substantial advantage compared with eGFRcr-PK. Future studies are warranted to better understand the large bias in eGFRcys and non-GFR determinants of cystatin C in South Asians.
展开▼
