...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurospine. >Perioperative Outcomes in 17,947 Patients Undergoing 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy for Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Conditions: A Propensity Score Matched National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis
【24h】

Perioperative Outcomes in 17,947 Patients Undergoing 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy for Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Conditions: A Propensity Score Matched National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis

机译:围手术期结果17,947名患者2级宫颈椎间盘切除术和融合,对1级前宫颈术治疗宫颈退行性条件:倾向评分符合国家外科质量改善计划分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To compare the perioperative morbidity of 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with that of 1-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative conditions. Methods A retrospective study of the 2005–2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for patients undergoing 2-level ACDF and 1-level ACCF was performed. Patient data included: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), functional status, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification. Hospital data included: operative time and length of hospital stay (LOS). Thirty-day outcome data included: any, serious, and minor adverse events, return to the operating room, readmission, and mortality. After propensity matching for age, sex, ASA PS classification, functional status, and BMI, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between the 2 propensity-matched subcohorts. Finally, multivariate logistic regression that additionally controlled for operative time was performed to compare the 2 propensity-matched subcohorts. Results A total of 17,497 cases were identified, with 90.20% undergoing 2-level ACDF and 9.80% undergoing 1-level ACCF. Patients undergoing 2-level ACDF were younger, more likely to be female, had higher functional status, and had shorter operative time and LOS (p 0.001). After propensity score matching, cases undergoing 1-level ACCF had a statistically significant higher rate of serious adverse events (p = 0.005). This difference was no longer significant after controlling for operative time. Conclusion While there was noted to be additional morbidity in 1-level ACCF cases relative to 2-level ACDF cases, the lack of difference once controlling for the surgical time supports using the procedure that best accomplishes the surgical objectives.
机译:目的比较的与1级颈前椎体和融合(ACCF),用于颈椎退行性病症的治疗的2级颈前椎间盘切除和融合(ACDF)的围手术期发病率。方法进行了二〇〇五年至2016年全国外科质量提高计划数据库对于接受2级ACDF和1级ACCF患者的回顾性研究。患者数据包括:年龄,性别,身体质量指数(BMI),功能状态,以及美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况(PS)的分类。医院的资料包括:手术时间和住院时间(LOS)的长度。包括三十一日结果数据:任何,严肃,和轻微的不良反应,回归到手术室,重新接纳和死亡率。倾向匹配后的年龄,性别,ASA PS分类,功能状态,以及BMI,采用多因素Logistic回归分析,比较2倾向性匹配subcohorts之间的结果。最后,进行该追加控制了手术时间多变量logistic回归比较2倾向匹配subcohorts。结果共17497案件进行鉴定,用90.20%进行2级ACDF和9.80%经历1级ACCF。经历2级ACDF较年轻的患者,更可能是女性,具有更高的功能状态,并且有手术时间短和LOS(P <0.001)。倾向得分匹配后,发生1级ACCF例,严重不良事件(P = 0.005)的统计显著率较高。这种差异对于控制手术时间后不再显著。结论虽然人们注意到,额外的发病率相对于2级ACDF病例1级ACCF的情况下,缺乏差异,一旦控制了使用最好的完成手术目标的过程手术时间支架。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号