...
首页> 外文期刊>National Journal of Laboratory Medicine >Reliability of Venous Electrolyte Measurement from the Point-of-Care Blood Gas Analyser- A Comparative Study with the Central Laboratory Autoanalyser in a Tertiary Care Emergency Department
【24h】

Reliability of Venous Electrolyte Measurement from the Point-of-Care Blood Gas Analyser- A Comparative Study with the Central Laboratory Autoanalyser in a Tertiary Care Emergency Department

机译:静脉电解质测量的可靠性来自护理点血气分析器 - 大专院产急诊部中央实验室自动αα的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Emergency Departments (EDs) utilise Point-OfCare (POC) equipment based on which the physicians decide on resuscitation and management. Along with many other parameters, POC Blood Gas Analysers (BGA) in the ED provide quick results on blood electrolytes, enabling physicians manage dyselectrolytemia immediately compared to the prolonged turnaround time from Central Laboratory (CL) Auto Analysers (AAs). ED physicians usually wait for AA result for confirmation of dyselectrolytemia. Aim: To compare sodium and potassium ions measurement in venous sample pairs between BGA and AA, and whether results from BGA could be acceptable as per standard norms, thus avoiding time delay in management of dyselectrolytemia and saving cost. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was done in the ED of a tertiary care centre in North Kerala. After Institutional Ethics Committee approval and obtaining informed consent, the study was conducted in 224 adult patients during July 2018 to July 2019 with clinical indications for Venous Blood Gas (VBG) and serum electrolytes as part of management. Venous samples from the patients were collected successively in heparin rinsed syringes and plain bottles and analysed in the POC BGA (ABL800 Flex Radiometer) in the ED and AA in the hospital central laboratory (Beckman Coulter AU 5800), respectively. Mean, standard deviation and two-tailed p-value were used for statistical analysis. Bland-Altman plots, box plot and scatter diagram were used for inter instrument comparison of results. Results: Out of 224 (122 males and 102 females) paired venous samples, the mean sodium (Na) were 131.6± 9.0 mmol/L (BGA) and 131.7±8.3 mmol/L (AA) with mean difference of 0.1 mmol/L. The mean patassium (K) was 3.6±0.7 mmol/L (BGA) and 4.0±0.77 mmol/L (AA) with mean difference of 0.4 mmol/L. The 95% limits of agreement for Na and K between equipment were -6.13 to 5.95 mmol/L and -1.28 to 0.6 mmol/L, respectively. Karl Pearson Correlation of Na and K assessment were 0.94 and 0.77 (p0.01), respectively. These values were within the accepted limit of the United States Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (difference of 4 mmol/L in sodium measurements and 0.5 mmol/L in potassium measurement from the gold standard). No Indian Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments were found. Conclusion: The authors found no statistically significant difference between BGA and AA in sodium and potassium measurement. This will enable emergency physician to make critical decisions by trusting sodium and potassium values obtained from the POC BGA.
机译:简介:应急部门(EDS)利用基于医生决定复苏和管理的Point-Ofcare(PoC)设备。随着许多其他参数,ED中的PoC血液天然气分析仪(BGA)在血液电解质上提供了快速的结果,使医生能够在中央实验室(CL)自动分析仪(AAS)的长期周转时间相比立即管理Dye Lelitertemia。 ED医师通常等待AA结果以确认肌电粒细胞血症。目的:将钠和钾离子测量比较BGA和AA之间的静脉样品对,以及BGA的结果是否可以根据标准规范来接受,从而避免使用电磁微粒血症的管理和节省成本的时间延迟。材料与方法:该研究在北喀拉拉邦的第三级护理中心ED中完成。在制度伦理委员会批准和获取知情同意之后,该研究在2018年7月至2019年7月至7月举行的224名成年患者中进行了静脉血气(VBG)和血清电解质作为管理的一部分。患者的静脉样品在肝素中连续收集,分别在肝素中的注射器和普通瓶中收集,并分别分析在医院中央实验室(Beckman Coulter Au 5800)中的ED和AA中的PoC BGA(Abl800柔性辐射计)中。平均值,标准偏差和双尾P值用于统计分析。 Bland-Altman情节,盒子图和散点图用于结果的仪器仪器比较。结果:224(男性和102名雌性)成对静脉样品,平均钠(NA)为131.6±9.0mmol / L(BGA)和131.7±8.3mmol / L(AA),平均差异为0.1mmol / L. 。平均髌果(K)为3.6±0.7mmol / L(BGA)和4.0±0.77mmol / L(AA),平均差异为0.4mmol / L.设备之间的NA和K之间的95%限制分别为-6.13至5.95mmol / L和-1.28至0.6mmol / L. Karl Pearson Na和K评估的相关性分别为0.94和0.77(P <0.01)。这些价值观在美国临床实验室改善修正案的公认限制(钠测量4mmol / L的差异和0.5mmol / L的金标准)。没有发现印度临床实验室改善修正案。结论:作者发现BGA和AA在钠和钾测量中没有统计学显着差异。这将使紧急医生能够通过信任从PoC BGA获得的钠和钾值来构建关键决策。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号