首页> 外文期刊>Korean journal of radiology : >Coronary Artery Lumen Segmentation Using Location–Adaptive Threshold in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Proof-of-Concept
【24h】

Coronary Artery Lumen Segmentation Using Location–Adaptive Threshold in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Proof-of-Concept

机译:冠状动脉内动脉腔分割在冠状动脉计算断层血管造影中使用位置自适应阈值:概念验证

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE:To compare the lumen parameters measured by the location-adaptive threshold method (LATM), in which the inter- and intra-scan attenuation variabilities of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) were corrected, and the scan-adaptive threshold method (SATM), in which only the inter-scan variability was corrected, with the reference standard measurement by intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS).MATERIALS AND METHODS:The Hounsfield unit (HU) values of whole voxels and the centerline in each of the cross-sections of the 22 target coronary artery segments were obtained from 15 patients between March 2009 and June 2010, in addition to the corresponding voxel size. Lumen volume was calculated mathematically as the voxel volume multiplied by the number of voxels with HU within a given range, defined as the lumen for each method, and compared with the IVUS-derived reference standard. Subgroup analysis of the lumen area was performed to investigate the effect of lumen size on the studied methods. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between the measurements.RESULTS:Lumen volumes measured by SATM was significantly smaller than that measured by IVUS (mean difference, 14.6 mm3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9-24.3 mm3); the lumen volumes measured by LATM and IVUS were not significantly different (mean difference, -0.7 mm3; 95% CI, -9.1-7.7 mm3). The lumen area measured by SATM was significantly smaller than that measured by LATM in the smaller lumen area group (mean of difference, 1.07 mm2; 95% CI, 0.89-1.25 mm2) but not in the larger lumen area group (mean of difference, -0.07 mm2; 95% CI, -0.22-0.08 mm2). In the smaller lumen group, the mean difference was lower in the Bland-Altman plot of IVUS and LATM (0.46 mm2; 95% CI, 0.27-0.65 mm2) than in that of IVUS and SATM (1.53 mm2; 95% CI, 1.27-1.79 mm2).CONCLUSION:SATM underestimated the lumen parameters for computed lumen segmentation in CCTA, and this may be overcome by using LATM.Copyright ? 2020 The Korean Society of Radiology.
机译:目的:比较通过位置自适应阈值方法(LATM)测量的内腔参数,其中校正了冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)的和扫描间衰减变形性(CCTA),以及扫描自适应阈值方法(SATM ),其中仅通过血管内超声(IVUS)的参考标准测量来校正扫描间变异性。材料和方法:Hounsfield单位(Hu)整个体素的值和每个横截面中的中心线除了相应的体素大小之外,22种靶冠状动脉段是从2009年3月和2010年3月的15名患者获得。在数学上计算腔体积,因为体积乘以Hu在给定范围内的体素数量乘以,定义为每种方法的内腔,并与IVUS衍生的参考标准进行比较。进行腔面积的亚组分析,以研究腔大小对研究方法的影响。 Bland-Altman图被用于评估测量之间的协议。结果:SATM测量的内腔体积显着小于IVUS测量的体积(平均差异,14.6mm3; 95%置信区间[CI],4.9-24.3mm 3);由Latm和IVUS测量的内腔体积没有显着差异(平均差异,-0.7mm 3; 95%CI,-9.1-7.7mm 3)。由SATM测量的腔面积显着小于较小的内腔区域组中拉伸测量的内腔区域(差异,1.07mm2; 95%CI,0.89-1.25mm 2)但不在较大的内腔区域组(差异的平均值, -0.07 mm2; 95%ci,-0.22-0.08 mm2)。在较小的腔组中,IVUS和LATM的平坦-Attman曲线图(0.46mm 2; 95%CI,0.27-0.65mm 2)中的平均差异低于IVUS和SATM(1.53mm2; 95%CI,1.27 -1.79 mm2)。结论:SATM低估CCTA中计算的腔分段的腔参数,并且可以通过使用Latm.copyight来克服这一点? 2020韩国放射学会。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号