...
首页> 外文期刊>Modern Pathology >Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists
【24h】

Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists

机译:人工智能援助通过病理学家显着改善了前列腺活组织检查的Glason分级

获取原文

摘要

The Gleason score is the most important prognostic marker for prostate cancer patients, but it suffers from significant observer variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems based on deep learning can achieve pathologist-level performance at Gleason grading. However, the performance of such systems can degrade in the presence of artifacts, foreign tissue, or other anomalies. Pathologists integrating their expertise with feedback from an AI system could result in a synergy that outperforms both the individual pathologist and the system. Despite the hype around AI assistance, existing literature on this topic within the pathology domain is limited. We investigated the value of AI assistance for grading prostate biopsies. A panel of 14 observers graded 160 biopsies with and without AI assistance. Using AI, the agreement of the panel with an expert reference standard increased significantly (quadratically weighted Cohen's kappa, 0.799 vs. 0.872; p-=-0.019). On an external validation set of 87 cases, the panel showed a significant increase in agreement with a panel of international experts in prostate pathology (quadratically weighted Cohen's kappa, 0.733 vs. 0.786; p-=-0.003). In both experiments, on a group-level, AI-assisted pathologists outperformed the unassisted pathologists and the standalone AI system. Our results show the potential of AI systems for Gleason grading, but more importantly, show the benefits of pathologist-AI synergy.
机译:Gleason评分是前列腺癌患者最重要的预后标志物,但它受到显着的观察者变异性。基于深度学习的人工智能(AI)系统可以实现Glason分级的病理学家级性能。然而,这种系统的性能可以在伪影,外来组织或其他异常存在下降解。将其专业知识与AI系统的反馈相结合的病理学家可能导致协同作用,以优于个人病理学家和系统。尽管AI援助周围的炒作,但病理域内的本主题的现有文献有限。我们调查了AI援助对前列腺活检的援助的价值。 14个观察者面板,具有160个活组织检查,没有AI援助。使用AI,专家参考标准的面板协议显着增加(二次加权Cohen的Kappa,0.799 Vs. 0.872; P - = - 0.019)。在一个外部验证集87个案件中,小组与前列腺病理学专家委员会的一致意见(二次加权Cohen的Kappa,0.733 Vs. 0.786; P - = - 0.003)达成重大增加。在两个实验中,在群体级别,AI辅助病理学家的表现优于无统治的病理学家和独立的AI系统。我们的结果表明AI系统为Glason分级的潜力,但更重要的是,展示了病理学家-AI协同作用的益处。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号