...
首页> 外文期刊>Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of Outcomes of Vision and Eye Screening of Children of Four Orphanages and School Children of Riyadh
【24h】

Comparison of Outcomes of Vision and Eye Screening of Children of Four Orphanages and School Children of Riyadh

机译:利雅得四个孤儿院儿童视力和眼筛查结果比较

获取原文

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose was to compare vision and ocular disease among orphans to age-matched school children and determine the barriers they faced for ophthalmic care in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Children of four orphanages of Riyadh (Gr1) were screened for vision refractive error (RE) and eye ailment on “World Sight Day–2019.” They were compared to age-matched school children (comparison group; Gr2). The rates of RE, strabismus, amblyopia, and allergic conjunctivitis were estimated in two groups. The coverage of existing eye services for orphan children was reviewed. RESULTS: We screened 53 children of Gr1 and 106 school children of Gr2. The risk of RE was statistically significantly higher in school children compared to orphan children (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2; 4.8] P = 0.01). The coverage of refractive services for Gr1 was significantly lower than for Gr2 (OR = 0.09 [95% CI 0.02; 0.4] P = 0.001). In Gr1, blurry vision (12 children), red eye (2), and itchy eyes (1) were the main symptoms. In Gr2, no child had eye complaints. In Gr1, amblyopia (1), strabismus (1), history of ocular trauma and surgery (1), eye medications needed (2), and systemic health problems were noted in 9 children. In Gr2, amblyopia (4), strabismus (4), and history of ocular surgery were noted in 2 children. CONCLUSION: Orphan children had less rate of myopia compared to school children. However, unattended ocular pathologies were detected during the screening campaign. The coverage of refractive services was low in these underprivileged children compared to school children.
机译:目的:目的是将孤儿中的视觉和眼部疾病与年龄匹配的学童进行比较,并确定他们面临的壁板在沙特阿拉伯利雅得的眼科护理。方法:筛选了利雅得(GR1)的四个孤儿院的儿童,用于“2019年世界视线”的视觉屈光误差(RE)和眼睛疾病。它们与年龄匹配的学童(比较组; GR2)进行比较。估计重新,斜视,弱视和过敏性结膜炎的速率在两组中估算。综述了孤儿儿童现有眼科服务的覆盖范围。结果:我们播放了GR2的GR1和106名儿童的53名儿童。与孤儿儿童相比,学龄儿童RE的风险在统计学上显着高(差距[或] = 2.4 [95%置信区间(CI)1.2; 4.8] P = 0.01)。 GR1屈光服务的覆盖率显着低于GR2(或= 0.09 [95%CI 0.02; 0.4] P = 0.001)。在GR1,模糊的视觉(12名儿童),红眼(2),眼睛(1)是主要症状。在GR2,没有孩子有眼睛投诉。在GR1,弱视(1),斜视(1),眼外伤和手术的历史(1),所需的眼药药(2),9名儿童注意到全身健康问题。在GR2,2个儿童中注意到弱视(4),斜视(4),斜视(4)和眼手术的历史。结论:与学童相比,孤儿儿童的近视率较少。然而,在筛选活动期间检测到无人看管的眼病理。与学童相比,这些贫困儿童的屈光服务覆盖率较低。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号