首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >A comparison of the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine external treatment for the hyperemesis gravidarum: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis
【24h】

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine external treatment for the hyperemesis gravidarum: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

机译:高血压妊娠中药外科治疗疗效和安全性的比较:系统审查与网络荟萃分析的议定书

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The symptoms of frequent nausea and vomiting, inability to eat, and fluid imbalance caused by hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) seriously impact the quality of life of pregnant women. In some serious cases, it is even necessary to terminate the pregnancy, and threatens the life of the pregnant woman. A great many of studies have proved that HG can be effectively treated by traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) external treatment. Nevertheless, its relative effectiveness and safety haven’t yet been confirmed because of the variety of TCM external treatment. Therefore, we will use the method of network meta-analysis to verify the effectiveness and safety of different types of TCM external treatment for the HG. Methods: In this study, English and Chinese literatures that meet the requirements will be searched in EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CnKI, VIP, Wanfang, and CBM. Regardless of whether blinding is used or not, all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using TCM external treatment for the HG will be included. Then, Stata 16.0 will be used to conduct a series of pairwise meta-analysis. WinBUGS 1.4.3 and Stata 16.0 will be used to conduct Bayesian network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative results of different TCM external treatments for the HG. The quality included in the study will be evaluated through the classification of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TCM external treatment for the HG according to the primary and secondary outcomes, and we rank different kinds of TCM external treatments in accordance with effectiveness. The primary outcomes are the intensity of nausea and vomiting. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, adverse outcome of pregnant women, adverse outcome of fetal, duration of hospitalization and so on. Conclusion: This study will provide more convincing and detailed information of TCM external treatment for the HG, and the reference value for clinical treatment. INPLASY registration number: INPLASY 202090089.
机译:背景:常见的恶心和呕吐,无法吃的症状,高血压引起的流体不平衡(Hg)严重影响了孕妇的生活质量。在一些严重的情况下,甚至有必要终止怀孕,并威胁着孕妇的生命。许多研究证明,HG可以通过中药(TCM)外部治疗有效治疗。然而,由于各种中医外部治疗,其相对有效性和安全性尚未确认。因此,我们将使用网络元分析方法来验证不同类型的TCM外部治疗HG的有效性和安全性。方法:在本研究中,符合要求的英文和中国文献将在Embase,Pubmed,Cochrane图书馆,科学网站,CNKI,VIP,WANFANG和CBM中搜索。无论是否使用致盲,都将包括所有随机对照试验(RCT)使用用于HG的TCM外部处理。然后,STATA 16.0将用于进行一系列成对元分析。 WINBUGS 1.4.3和Stata 16.0将用于进行贝叶斯网络元分析,以评估HG对不同中医外部治疗的相对结果。本研究中包含的质量将通过建议评估,开发和评估(等级)分级进行评估。结果:本研究将根据主要和二次结果评估HG对HG外部治疗的有效性和安全性,我们按照有效性排列不同类型的中医外部治疗。主要结果是恶心和呕吐的强度。二次结果包括孕妇的生活质量,孕妇的不利结果,胎儿的不利结果,住院时间等。结论:本研究将提供更令人信服和详细的HG外部治疗信息,以及临床治疗的参考值。入口登记号码:InPlasy 202090089。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号