首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pediatrics >Comparative Performance of Modified Kenneth Jones Criteria Scoring, World Health Organization Criteria, and Antibodies in Lymphocyte Supernatant for Diagnosing Tuberculosis in Severely Malnourished Children Presenting With Pneumonia
【24h】

Comparative Performance of Modified Kenneth Jones Criteria Scoring, World Health Organization Criteria, and Antibodies in Lymphocyte Supernatant for Diagnosing Tuberculosis in Severely Malnourished Children Presenting With Pneumonia

机译:改进的Kenneth Jones标准评分,世界卫生组织标准和淋巴细胞上清液中的抗体的比较表现,用于患有肺炎的严重营养不良的儿童结核病

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis (TB) can be difficult in severely malnourished children. This is mainly due to the fact of our perceived notion that clinical signs of TB are often subtle in severely malnourished children and we may rely on laboratory investigation for the diagnosis. However, comparative data on the performance of clinical and laboratory diagnostics of TB in such population are also very limited. Objectives: To compare the performance of composite clinical criteria and a technique that measures antibodies in lymphocyte supernatant (ALS) for the diagnosis of TB in severely malnourished children with pneumonia. Methods: Severely malnourished children under five with radiological pneumonia admitted to the Dhaka Hospital of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh were enrolled consecutively following informed consent. We collected venous blood for ALS, gastric lavage fluid and induced sputum for microscopy, mycobacterial culture, and real-time PCR by Xpert MTB/RIF. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of modified Kenneth Jones criteria (MKJC) score, World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, and ALS in diagnosing TB in severely malnourished children with pneumonia for “Confirmed TB” and “All TB” (“Confirmed TB” plus “Probable TB”) versus “Not TB”. Results: Compared to culture confirmed TB, the sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) for MKJC were 60 (27-86)% and 84 (79-87)% and for WHO criteria were 40 (14-73)% and 84 (80-87)% respectively. Compared to culture and/or Xpert MTB/RIF positive TB, the sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) for the criteria were 37 (20-58)% and 84 (79-87)%; and 22 (9-43)% and 83 (79-87)% respectively. For both these comparisons, the sensitivity and specificity of ALS were 50 (14-86)% and 60 (53-67)% respectively. Conclusion: Our data suggest that WHO criteria and MKJC scoring mainly based on clinical criteria are more useful than ALS in diagnosing TB in young severely malnourished children with pneumonia. The results underscore the importance of using clinical criteria for the diagnosis of TB in severely malnourished children that may help to minimize the chance of over treatment with anti-TB in such population, especially in resource limited TB endemic settings.
机译:背景:严重营养不良的儿童诊断儿童结核病(TB)可能困难。这主要是由于我们的感知观念,即TB的临床症状往往是微妙的营养不良的儿童,我们可能依靠实验室调查进行诊断。然而,关于这种人群中TB临床和实验室诊断性能的比较数据也非常有限。目标:比较复合临床标准的性能和一种测量淋巴细胞上清液(ALS)抗体的技术,用于患有肺炎的严重营养不良的儿童TB。方法:孟加拉国达到达卡医院的达卡医院的五个营养不良的儿童,孟加拉国达到达卡医院,孟加拉国在知情同意之后,孟加拉国被纳入连续。我们收集了ALS,胃灌洗液的静脉血液,诱导XPERT MTB / RIF的显微镜,分枝杆菌培养物和实时PCR的痰。我们比较了改进的Kenneth Jones标准(MKJC)评分,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)标准,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)标准和ALS在诊断TB中的敏感营养不良的儿童患有肺炎和“确认的结核病”和“所有TB”(“确认TB”加“可能的TB”)与“不是TB”。结果:与培养确认的TB相比,MKJC的敏感性和特异性(95%CI)为60(27-86)%,84(79-87)%,均为世卫组织标准为40(14-73)%和84( 80-87)%分别。与培养和/或XPERT MTB / RIF阳性TB相比,标准的敏感性和特异性(95%CI)为37(20-58)%和84(79-87)%;和22(9-43)%和83(79-87)%。对于这些比较,Als的敏感性和特异性分别为50(14-86)%和60(53-67)%。结论:我们的数据表明,世卫组织标准和MKJC评分主要基于临床标准的评分比患有肺炎的年轻严重营养不良的儿童诊断结核病的ALS更有用。结果强调了使用临床标准在严重营养不良的儿童中使用临床标准的重要性,这可能有助于尽量减少在这些人群中用抗结核病治疗的机会,特别是在资源限制的TB流行环境中。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号