...
首页> 外文期刊>Macedonian Veterinary Review >Usage of laryngeal mask airway devices in veterinary medicine
【24h】

Usage of laryngeal mask airway devices in veterinary medicine

机译:喉部药物在兽医中的用途

获取原文

摘要

Providing a secure airway management during general anesthesia could be problematic in some medical cases, especially when there is a risk of regurgitation and aspiration of the gastric content due to increased intragastric pressure. The current study aimed to test the applicability of two types of LMA in several animal species and to compare its effectiveness to the endotracheal intubation method in securing sealed airway respiration as an alternative to using endotracheal tubes. The study was conducted in dogs (n=33), cats (n=9), swine (n=9), rabbits (n=5), sheep (n=7) and roe deer (n=1). One or both types of laryngeal masks were used for each animal species: LMA Classic?-cLMA and LMA ProSeal?-PLMA. The assessment of each laryngeal mask was performed by determining the insertion technique, the possibilities of first-attempt insertion and malposition, the compliance with various animal species, ventilation time, cuff pressure, and sealing capacity. The highest LMA size compatility in dogs (23,87±14,30 kg) was size-3 in six and size-4 in forteen subjects; In swine (43,22±12,32 kg), size-4; In rabbits (3,84±0,36 kg) size-1; and in sheep (48,29±4,65 kg) size-3 and size-4. Ventilation time was highest in swine and roe deer (121,11±42,85 min and 300,00 min, respectively) and lowest in cat (28,33±16,96 min). First-attempt LMA insertion success was lowest in rabbits (60%), and highest in sheep and roe deer (100%). Malposition was with highest rate in rabbits (40%) and lowest in cat, sheep and roe deer (0%). Gastric reflux was most frequently observed in sheep (71,4%) and roe deer (100%). The usage of LMA in the veterinary anesthetic practice significantly improves airway management in animals during general anesthesia. The inflated LMA cuff does not prevent its disposition. Therefore, both the drain and respiratory tubes must be fixed. The usage of LMA in rabbits was associated with higher incidence of malposition and other complications. Our findings suggest that LMA designed for humans can be used for airway management in veterinary medicine.
机译:在一般麻醉期间提供安全的气道管理可能在一些医疗案例中存在问题,特别是当由于胃内压增加而存在胃含量的反冲和吸入的风险时。目前的研究旨在测试两种动物物种中的两种类型的LMA,并比较其对压膜插管方法的有效性,以防止密封的气道呼吸作为使用气管内管的替代方案。该研究在狗(n = 33)中进行,猫(n = 9),猪(n = 9),兔(n = 5),绵羊(n = 7)和獐鹿(n = 1)。每种动物物种使用一种或两种类型的喉口罩:LMA经典?-ClMA和LMA ProSeal?-Plma。通过确定插入技术,首次尝试插入和孕口的可能性,符合各种动物物种,通风时间,袖带压力和密封能力来进行每种喉掩模的评估。狗的最高LMA尺寸兼容性(23,87±14,30千克)尺寸为六个和尺寸-3,在Forteen受试者中为4;在猪(43,22±12,32千克),尺寸-4;在兔子(3,84±0.36千克)尺寸-1;在绵羊(48,29±4,65千克)尺寸-3和尺寸-4。通风时间在猪和獐鹿(121,11±42,85分钟和300,00分钟)中最高,猫(28,33±16,96分钟)。首先尝试LMA插入成功在兔子中最低(60%),绵羊和狍子(100%)中最高。母体素在兔子,猫,绵羊和狍子(0%)中以最高的速率(40%)和最低速度。在绵羊(71,4%)和狍(100%)中最常观察到胃流回流。 LMA在兽医学实践中的使用显着改善了在全身麻醉期间动物的气道管理。膨胀的LMA袖带不会阻止其性格。因此,必须固定排水管和呼吸管。 LMA在兔子中的使用与较高的孕育发生率和其他并发症有关。我们的研究结果表明,为人类设计的LMA可用于兽医中的气道管理。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号