首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Surgery >Secondary Angio-Embolization After Emergent Pelvic Stabilization and Pelvic Packing Is a Safe Option for Patients With Persistent Hemorrhage From Unstable Pelvic Ring Injuries
【24h】

Secondary Angio-Embolization After Emergent Pelvic Stabilization and Pelvic Packing Is a Safe Option for Patients With Persistent Hemorrhage From Unstable Pelvic Ring Injuries

机译:继发性骨盆​​稳定和骨盆包装后的次级血管栓塞是一种安全的骨盆损伤患者的安全选择

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: In patients with severe pelvic ring injuries, exsanguinating hemorrhage represents the major cause of death within the first 24 hours. Mechanical pelvic stabilization and surgical hemostasis by pelvic packing aim to control venous bleeding. Angiography and embolization have emerged as methods for addressing arterial bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of postoperative angio-embolization following mechanical pelvic ring injury stabilization and pelvic packing. The sources of ongoing bleeding and patient’s outcome were evaluated. Patients and Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study at a single academic level I trauma center, reviewing all patients with pelvic ring injuries admitted from 01/2010 to 12/2019. Patients with emergent mechanical pelvic ring stabilization (supraacetabular external fixator and/or pelvic C-clamp) and direct pre-peritoneal pelvic packing were further analyzed. Patients that underwent postoperative angio-embolization were compared with those that did not. All postoperative angio-embolizations were evaluated with regards to bleeding sources and type of embolization. Results: During the study period, 39 patients required immediate mechanical pelvic stabilization and direct pre-peritoneal pelvic packing. Of these, 12 patients (30.8%) underwent a postoperative angio-embolization. Bleeding sources identified were the superior gluteal artery in 6 cases, the obturator artery in 2 cases, the internal pudendal artery in 2 cases and unnamed branches of the internal iliac artery in 3 cases. In 11 patients, a selective embolization of the bleeding artery was performed; in 1 patient, an unilateral complete occlusion of the internal iliac artery was necessary to control the bleeding. Mean time from admission to surgery was 52.8 ± 14.7 minutes and the mean time from admission to angio-embolization was 189.1 ± 55.5 minutes. Three patients died in the further hospital course due to multiple organ failure (n=2) and traumatic brain injury (n=1). Conclusion: Secondary angio-embolization after external pelvic fixation and pre-peritoneal pelvic packing was effective in controlling ongoing bleeding. In all patients, angio-embolization was safely performed on the way from the operating room to the intensive care unit. The most frequent bleeding source was the superior gluteal artery, which is difficult to surgically address, further highlighting the importance of angio-embolization in the management algorithm.
机译:介绍:在患有严重的盆腔损伤的患者中,患者出血是在前24小时内代表死亡的主要原因。通过骨盆包装术治疗静脉血入化的机械盆腔稳定和外科止血。血管造影和栓塞已成为解决动脉出血的方法。本研究的目的是评估机械盆腔损伤稳定和骨盆包装后术后血管栓塞的发生率。评估了持续出血和患者的结果。患者及方法:临界观测队列在一级学术级的研究队列研究,审查所有盆腔伤害患者从01/2010达到12/2019。进一步分析了急诊机械盆腔稳定(Supraetabular外固定器和/或盆腔C夹)和直接预腹膜骨盆包装患者。与没有的患者进行了术后血管栓塞的患者。关于出血来源和栓塞类型评估所有术后血管栓塞。结果:在研究期间,39名患者需要立即机械盆腔稳定和直接腹膜骨盆包装。其中,12名患者(30.8%)经历了术后血管栓塞。鉴定的出血来源是6例,闭塞器动脉的血液动脉2例,内部硫代菌动脉2例,内部髂动脉的2例愈合分支3例。在11名患者中,进行了出血动脉的选择性栓塞;在1例患者中,必须对内部髂动脉进行单侧完全闭塞来控制出血。入学手术的平均时间为52.8±14.7分钟,血管栓塞的平均时间为189.1±55.5分钟。由于多种器官衰竭(n = 2)和创伤性脑损伤(n = 1),三名患者在另外的医院病程中死亡。结论:外骨盆固定后的次级血管栓塞和腹膜前骨盆包装在控制持续出血中是有效的。在所有患者中,血管栓塞在从手术室到重症监护室的方式安全地进行。最常见的出血来源是优质衰弱的衰弱,这难以外科地址,进一步突出了血管栓塞在管理算法中的重要性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号