首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Public Health's Next Step in Advancing Equity: Re-evaluating Epistemological Assumptions to Move Social Determinants From Theory to Practice
【24h】

Public Health's Next Step in Advancing Equity: Re-evaluating Epistemological Assumptions to Move Social Determinants From Theory to Practice

机译:公共卫生的下一步推进股权:重新评估认识论假设,以使社会决定因素从理论到实践

获取原文
           

摘要

The field of public health has increasingly promoted a social ecological approach to health, shifting from an individual, biomedical paradigm to a recognition of social and structural determinants of health and health equity. Yet despite this shift, public health research and practice continue to privilege individual- and interpersonal-level measurements and interventions. Rather than adapting public health practice to social ecological theory, the field has layered new concepts (“root causes,” “social determinants”) onto a biomedical paradigm—attempting to answer questions presented by the social ecological schema with practices developed in response to biomedicine. This stymies health equity work before it begins—limiting the field’s ability to broaden conceptions of well-being, redress histories of inequitable knowledge valuation, and advance systems-level change. To respond effectively to our knowledge of social determinants, public health must resolve the ongoing disconnect between social ecological theory and biomedically-driven practice. To that end, this article issues a clarion call to complete the shift from a biomedical to a social ecological paradigm, and provides a basis for moving theory into practice. It examines biomedicine's foundations and limitations, glosses existing critiques of the paradigm, and describes health equity challenges presented by over-reliance on conventional practices. It then offers theoretical and epistemological direction for developing innovative social ecological strategies that advance health equity.
机译:公共卫生领域越来越多地促进了健康的社会生态方法,从个人生物医学范例转移到认识到健康和健康股权的社会和结构决定因素。然而,尽管这种转变,公共卫生研究和实践将继续享有个人和人际关系测量和干预措施。该领域而不是将公共卫生实践适应社会生态学理论,而是将新概念(“根本原因”,“社会决定因素”)在生物医学范式上试图回答社会生态学架构与对生物医学的做法提出的问题。 。这种史黛斯健康股权在它开始 - 限制了领域扩大福祉概念的能力,提供了不公平知识估值的历史,以及提前系统级变化。为了有效应对我们对社会决定因素的知识,公共卫生必须解决社会生态理论与生物专业驱动的实践之间的持续断开。为此,本文发出了一个明亮的呼吁,以完成从生物医学的转变为社会生态范式,并为将理论转移到实践中提供了基础。它审查了生物医学的基础和局限性,掩盖了范式的现有批评,并描述了过度依赖传统实践所提出的健康股权挑战。然后,它为发展卫生股权的创新社会生态战略提供理论和认识论方向。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号