首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Impact of Health Promotion Interventions on Early Childhood Caries Prevention in Children Aged 2–5 Years Receiving Dental Treatment Under General Anesthesia
【24h】

Impact of Health Promotion Interventions on Early Childhood Caries Prevention in Children Aged 2–5 Years Receiving Dental Treatment Under General Anesthesia

机译:健康促进干预措施对6 - 5年儿童早期龋病预防接受全身麻醉下牙科治疗的儿童龋病预防

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of health promotion interventions on early childhood caries prevention in 2-5-year-olds receiving dental treatment under general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven mother-child couples presenting to the clinic of the Dental School of Tehran University of Medical Sciences for treatment under general anesthesia were randomly divided to two groups: 19 couples in the pamphlet and fluoride varnish 4 times a year, and 18 couples in the pamphlet plus six phone call reminders and fluoride varnish 4 times a year. A standard questionnaire on demographics and children oral health-related practice of parents was completed by respondents. On children’s oral examination, the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S), dmft, and the presence of new white spot lesions (WS) were recorded in both phases. At the final stage, Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) was completed by parents. The length of follow-up was 24 months. Results: In both groups, there was an increase in the number of mothers who knew how to brush their children’s teeth as well as the number of mothers who brushed their children’s teeth (P0.05). In the reminder group, an improvement occurred in the mothers’ perception of their perceived ability to make their children brush their teeth twice a day (P=0.03). Clinical examination revealed a significant decrease in the OHI-S (from 1.9±0.8 to 1.15±0.5) and the number of WS (from 8.5±5.5 to 0.08±0.5) in both groups on the follow-up visit. The mean dmft was 11.0±4.0 with a mean d component of 10.56±4 at the baseline, which decreased significantly to 1.44±1.96 after dental treatment. No significant increase was seen in new caries in the intervention groups. There was no significant difference in the ECOHIS score between the two groups. Conclusion: The similar impact of both interventions suggests the possibility of applying the simpler one, i.e. the educational pamphlet, fluoride varnish and frequent follow-ups. However, in the reminder group, the mothers’ perception of their perceived ability to make children brush their teeth twice a day was improved.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估健康促进干预措施对2-5岁儿童早期龋齿预防的影响,在全身麻醉下接受牙科治疗。材料和方法:三十七位母子夫妇向德黑兰医学院牙科学校诊所进行了一般麻醉,随机分为两组:19夫妇在小册子和氟化物清漆4次,每年4次,和18夫妇在小册子里加上六个电话提醒和氟化物每年4次。受访者完成了关于人口统计学和儿童口腔健康状况实践的标准问卷。在儿童的口腔检查中,在两个阶段记录了简化口腔卫生指数(OCI-S),DMFT和新白斑病变(WS)的存在。在最后阶段,父母完成了早期儿童口腔健康冲击量表(ECOHIS)。随访时间为24个月。结果:在这两个团体中,母亲的数量增加了如何刷他们的孩子的牙齿以及刷子孩子牙齿的母亲数量(P <0.05)。在提醒小组中,母亲对他们的感知能力的看法发生了改善,让孩子每天两次刷牙(P = 0.03)。临床检查显示在后续访问的两组中,OCI-S(从1.9±0.8至1.15±0.5±0.5±0.5±0.08±0.08±0.08±0.5)显着降低。平均DMFT为11.0±4.0,平均d分量为基线10.56±4,在牙科治疗后明显减少至1.44±1.96。在干预群中的新龋齿中没有显着增加。两组之间的ECOHIS得分无显着差异。结论:两种干预措施的影响表明,施加更简单的可能性,即教育小册子,氟化物清漆和频繁的随访。然而,在提醒小组中,母亲的看法让孩子们每天两次让孩子刷牙的能力得到了改善。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号