首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Well-Being in Life and Well-Being at Work: Which Comes First? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study
【24h】

Well-Being in Life and Well-Being at Work: Which Comes First? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study

机译:在生活中幸福和幸福的工作:这是第一位的?来自纵向研究的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Understanding reciprocal relationships between specific arenas in life and at work is critical for designing interventions to improve workplace health and safety. Most studies about the links between dimensions of well-being in life and at work have been cross-sectional and usually narrowly focused on one of the dimensions of the work-life well-being link. The issues of causality and feedback between life and work well-being have often not been addressed. We overcome these issues by measuring six aspects of well-being for both the work arena and life in general, using longitudinal data with a clear temporal sequence of cause and effect, and by explicitly accounting for feedback with potential effects in both directions. 954 Mexican apparel factory workers at a major global brand participated in two waves of the Worker Well-Being Survey. Data on life satisfaction and job satisfaction, happiness and positive affect, meaning and purpose, health, and social relationships in life and at work were used. Lagged regression controlling for confounders and prior outcomes was employed. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the robustness of the results to potential unmeasured confounding. For the relationships between life satisfaction and job satisfaction and between happiness in life and happiness at work effects in both directions were found. Nevertheless, indication of a larger effect of life satisfaction on job satisfaction than the reverse was obtained. For depression and meaning in life, there was evidence for an effect of life well-being on work-related well-being, but not for the reverse. For social relationships and purpose, there was evidence for an effect of work-related well-being on life well-being, but not the reverse. Relationships based on the longitudinal data were considerably weaker than their respective cross-sectional associations. This study contributes to our understanding of the nature of the relationship between aspects of well-being in the arenas of life and work. Findings from this study may facilitate the development of novel workplace programs promoting working conditions that enable lifelong flourishing in life and at work.
机译:了解生活中特定竞技场和工作之间的互惠关系对于设计干预措施至关重要,以改善工作场所健康和安全。关于生活中幸福和工作的尺寸之间的联系的大多数研究已经是横截面,通常狭义地聚焦在工作寿命井中的一个尺寸上。常常没有解决生命与工作之间的因果关系和反馈问题。我们通过衡量工作竞技场和寿命的六个方面来克服这些问题,通常使用明确的时间的原因和效果,并通过明确地核对在两个方向上具有潜在效应的反馈。全球主要品牌的954名墨西哥服装厂工人参加了两波浪的工人幸福的调查。使用生活满意度和工作满意度,幸福和积极影响,效果和宗旨,健康,健康和社会关系。采用了对混乱和先前结果的滞后回归。敏感性分析用于评估结果对潜在未测量混淆的鲁棒性。对于生活满意度和工作满意度之间的关系,并且在两个方向上的工作效果之间的生活与幸福之间的关系。然而,获得了比工作满意度的更大效果比反向更大的生活满意度。对于生活中的抑郁和意义,有证据表明生活福祉与工作有关的福祉,但不逆转。对于社会关系和目的,有证据表明与工作相关的福祉效果福祉,但并非反向。基于纵向数据的关系比其各自的横截面关联相当弱。这项研究有助于了解我们对生命和工作中幸福方面的关系的性质。本研究的调查结果可以促进新的工作场所方案的发展,促进能够在生命和工作中蓬勃发展的终身蓬勃发展的工作条件。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号