首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Risk Factors for Primary Clostridium difficile Infection; Results From the Observational Study of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients With Infective Diarrhea (ORCHID)
【24h】

Risk Factors for Primary Clostridium difficile Infection; Results From the Observational Study of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients With Infective Diarrhea (ORCHID)

机译:原发性梭菌感染的危险因素;感染性腹泻住院患者患者腹股沟困难感染的危险因素的观察研究结果(兰花)

获取原文
       

摘要

Background There are conflicting data on the risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in the literature. Aims To use two C. difficile infection (CDI) case-control study groups to compare risk factors in hospitalised patients with diarrhoea across different countries. Methods A multi-centre group of CDI cases/controls were identified by standardised testing from seven countries from the prior EUropean, multi-centre, prospective bi-annual point prevalence study of CLostridium difficile Infection in hospitalised patients with Diarrhoea (EUCLID). A second group of CDI cases/controls was identified from a single centre in Germany (parallel study site (PSS)). Data were extracted from the medical notes to assess CDI risk factors. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify and compare risk factors between the two groups. Results There were 253 and 158 cases and 921 and 584 controls in the PSS and EUCLID groups, respectively. Significant variables from univariate analyses in both groups were age ≥65, number of antibiotics and prior hospital admission (all p0.001). Congestive heart failure, diabetes, admission from assisted living or Emergency Department, proton pump inhibitors and chronic renal disease were significant in PSS (all p0.05) but not EUCLID. Dementia and admitted with other bacterial diseases were significant in EUCLID (p0.05) but not PSS. Following multivariate analyses, age ≥65, number of antibiotics and prior hospital admission were consistently identified as CDI risk factors in each individual group and combined datasets. Conclusion Our results show that the same CDI risk factors were identified across datasets. These were age ≥65 years, antibiotic use and prior hospital admission. Importantly, the odds of developing CDI increases with each extra antibiotic prescribed.
机译:背景技术关于文献中的梭菌艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的风险因素存在冲突数据。旨在使用两种C.艰难梭菌感染(CDI)案例对照研究组,以比较住院治疗患者腹泻的危险因素。方法采用七个国家的标准化检测从先前的欧洲,多中心,前瞻性腹泻(EuclID)患者(Euclid)中的七个国家的标准化测试确定了多中心CDI病例/对照。第二组CDI案例/对照是从德国的单一中心确定的(并行研究现场(PSS))。从医疗说明中提取数据以评估CDI风险因素。单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归模型用于识别和比较两组之间的风险因素。结果分别存在253例和158例,PSS和Euclid组分别对照有921%和584例。两组单次分析中的重大变量≥65岁,抗生素数量和先前入院(所有P <0.001)。充血性心力衰竭,糖尿病,辅助生活或急诊部的入场,质子泵抑制剂和慢性肾病在PSS中具有显着性(所有P <0.05)但不是Euclid。痴呆症并在其他细菌疾病中占用了Euclid(P <0.05)但不是PSS。在多变量分析之后,≥65岁,抗生素数量和先前医院入院的次数始终如一地确定为每个组和组合数据集中的CDI危险因素。结论我们的结果表明,在数据集中识别了相同的CDI风险因素。这些≥65岁,抗生素使用和现有医院入院。重要的是,开发CDI的几率随着每种额外抗生素规定的增加。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号