...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >International Multi-Center Analysis of In-hospital Morbidity and Mortality of Low-Voltage Electrical Injuries
【24h】

International Multi-Center Analysis of In-hospital Morbidity and Mortality of Low-Voltage Electrical Injuries

机译:国际多中心分析医院内部发病率和低压电压死亡率

获取原文

摘要

Background: Patients with high- and low-voltage electrical injuries differ in their clinical presentation from minor symptoms to life-threatening conditions. For an adequate diagnosis and treatment strategy a multidisciplinary team is often needed, due to the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation. To minimize costs and medical resources, especially for patients with mild symptoms presenting after low-voltage electrical injuries, risk stratification for the development of further complications is needed. Methods: During 2012-2019 two independent patient cohorts admitted with electrical injuries in two maximum care university hospitals in Germany and Austria were investigated to quantify risk factors for prolonged treatment, the need of surgery and death in low-voltage injuries. High-voltage injuries were used as reference in the analysis of the low-voltage electrical injury. Results: We analyzed 239 admitted patients with low-voltage (75%; 276±118V), high-voltage (17%; 12.385±28.896V) or unclear voltage (8%). Overall mortality was 2% (N=5) associated only with high-voltage injuries. Patients with low-voltage injuries presented with electrocution entry marks (63%), various neurological symptoms (31%), burn injuries (at least second degree) (23%), pain (27%), and cardiac symptoms (9%) including self-limiting thoracic pain and dysrhythmia without any therapeutic need. 73% of patients with low-voltage injury were discharged within 24 hours. The remaining patients stayed in the hospital (11±10 days) for treatment of entry marks and burns, with an overall need for surgery of 12% in all low-voltage injuries. Conclusions: The only identified risk factors for prolonged hospital stay in patients with low-voltage electrical injuries were the treatment of burns and electric marks. In this multi-center analysis of hospitalized patients, low-voltage electrical injuries were not associated with cardiac arrhythmia or mortality. Therefore, we suggest that asymptomatic patients, without preexisting conditions, with low-voltage injury can be discharged after an initial check-up without prolonged monitoring.
机译:背景:高压电压患者的临床介绍与危及生命条件的临床表现不同。对于足够的诊断和治疗策略,由于临床表现的异质性,通常需要多学科团队。为了最大限度地减少成本和医疗资源,特别是对于低压电伤后呈现轻微症状的患者,需要进行进一步并发症的风险分层。方法:在2012 - 2019年期间,在德国和奥地利的两个最高护理大学医院中承认的两个独立患者群体被调查,以量化长期治疗的风险因素,低压损伤的手术和死亡的需要。在低压电损伤分析中使用高压损伤作为参考。结果:我们分析了239例低压(75%; 276±118V),高压(17%; 12.385±28.896V)或不清晰的电压(8%)。只有高压损伤,总体死亡率为2%(n = 5)。患有电压入口标记(63%),各种神经系统症状(31%),烧伤(至少二级),疼痛(27%)和心脏症状(9%)包括自限胸部疼痛和不良患者,没有任何治疗需求。 73%的低压损伤患者在24小时内排出。其余患者留在医院(11±10天),用于治疗入口标记和烧伤,总体需求在所有低压损伤中进行12%的手术。结论:低压电压患者长期住院患者的唯一确定的危险因素是烧伤和电痕的治疗。在这种住院患者的这种多中心分析中,低压电压与心律失常或死亡率无关。因此,我们建议在没有预先存在的条件下无症状的患者,在没有长时间监测的情况下初步检查后可以放电低压损伤。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号