首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol Improved Patient Attendance in Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis
【24h】

Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol Improved Patient Attendance in Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis

机译:低体积聚乙二醇在结肠镜检查前改善了肠道准备的患者考勤:具有试验顺序分析的Meta分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been regarded as the primary recommendation for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. However, a conclusive conclusion has not yet been generated. Aim: We performed this updated meta-analysis to further investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of low volume preparation based on PEG plus ascorbic acid related to 4L PEG. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to retrieve potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from January 2000 to April 2018. Two independent searchers critically searched all potential citations, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias accordingly. Moreover, we used the STATA 12.0 and trial sequential analysis (TSA) 0.9 to complete all analyses. Results: A total of 13 RCTs enrolling 3910 patients met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis based on PP analysis indicated that compared to standard volume PEG regime, low volume regime improved patient compliance (RR=1.01; 95% CIs=1.00,1.03 ; P=0.143 (≥75% intake); RR=1.07; 95% CIs=1.00,1.14; P=0.046 (100% intake), the willingness to repeat the same regime (RR=1.30; 95% CIs=1.07,157; P=0.007) and patient acceptability (RR=1.18; 95% CIs=1.07,1.29; P=0.001), and decreased the overall adverse events (RR=0.86; 95% CIs=0.77,0.96; P=0.009). However, no difference was observed between these two different solutions for bowel preparation efficacy (RR=0.98; 95% CIs=0.95,1.02; P=0.340). These all results were further confirmed by TSA. Conclusions: The effect of low volume regime was not inferior to the standard volume PEG regime, and low volume regime was associated with better compliance when subjects ingested all the solution, willingness to repeat the same regime, higher acceptability and lower nausea in non-selected population.
机译:背景:聚乙二醇(PEG)被认为是结肠镜检查前肠道制剂的主要推荐。但是,结论尚未产生结论。目的:我们进行了该更新的荟萃分析,进一步研究了基于PEG加上4L PEG相关的抗坏血酸的低体积制剂的对比疗效和安全性。方法:进行系统搜索,以从2000年1月至2018年4月检索受对受控试验(中央)的潜在随机对照试验(RCT)的受控试验中的潜在随机对照试验(RCT)。两个独立的搜索者批评所有潜在的引用,提取数据,并相应地评估偏见的风险。此外,我们使用STATA 12.0和试验顺序分析(TSA)0.9完成所有分析。结果:共注明3910名患者的13名RCT符合纳入标准。基于PP分析的META分析表明,与标准体积PEG方案相比,低卷制度改善了患者依从性(RR = 1.01; 95%CIS = 1.00,1.03; P = 0.143(≥75%的摄入量); RR = 1.07; 95 %CIS = 1.00,1.14; P = 0.046(摄入量100%),重复相同的制度的意愿(RR = 1.30; 95%CIS = 1.07,157; P = 0.007)和患者可接受性(RR = 1.18; 95% CIS = 1.07,1.29; p = 0.001),并降低总不良事件(RR = 0.86; 95%CIS = 0.77,0.96; P = 0.009)。然而,这两种不同的肠道制备疗效之间没有观察到差异(RR = 0.98; 95%CIS = 0.95,1.02; P = 0.340)。这些结果通过TSA进一步证实了所有结果。结论:低批量制度的影响不逊色于标准批量标准,低批量制度当受试者摄取所有解决方案时,与更好的合规性相关联,愿意重复相同的政权,更高的可接受性和未选择的人群的恶心。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号