...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Comparable Long-Term Outcomes of Cyclosporine and Infliximab in Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Comparable Long-Term Outcomes of Cyclosporine and Infliximab in Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-Analysis

机译:类霉菌和英夫利昔单抗的可比长期结果在类固醇难治急性严重溃疡性结肠炎的患者中:荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: In steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), cyclosporine (CYS) or infliximab (IFX) may be considered as a second-line alternative to avoid colectomy. There are short-term data reported, but until now, there is no meta-analysis regarding long-term outcomes of CYS and IFX in patients with ASUC. Aim: To compare long-term efficacy and safety of CYS and IFX in a meta-analysis. Methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for studies which compared CYS versus IFX in adults with ASUC. Long-term colectomy-free rate from one year to ten years during CYS or IFX therapy was collected, last updated up to 22nd May 2019. Primary outcome was long-term colectomy-free rate, secondary outcomes were adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE) and mortality. Long-term colectomy-free survival and safety measures were pooled with the random-effect model. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: Data from 1,607 patients in 15 trials were extracted. In the first three years, pooled OR for colectomy-free survival was higher with IFX than with CYS (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11 –2.29, p = 0.012; OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.14 – 2.18, p = 0.006; and OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.08 – 2.84, p = 0.024; at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively). However, the significant difference remained undetected from the fourth year of follow-up and in subgroup of RCTs (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.90 – 2.01, p = 0.143; OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 0.94 – 2.12, p = 0.096; and OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.89 – 2.00, p = 0.157; at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively). No significant difference was detected regarding adverse events, serious adverse events and mortality between the groups. The neutral associations proved to be underpowered with trial sequential analysis. Conclusion: However observational studies show IFX as a better choice, according to the RCTs, choosing either CYS or IFX as rescue therapy for ASUC, the long-term outcomes are not different, although further large RCTs are warranted.
机译:背景:在类固醇 - 难治性急性严重溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)中,环孢菌素(Cys)或英夫利昔单抗(IFX)可以被认为是避免联络术的第二线替代方案。报告的短期数据,但到目前为止,ASUC患者的CYS和IFX长期结果没有荟萃分析。目的:在荟萃分析中比较Cys和IFX的长期疗效和安全性。方法:搜索三种电子数据库(PubMed,Embase,Cochrane中央登记册)进行了对与ASUC成年人的CYS与IFX相比的研究。在Cys或IFX疗法期间,从一年到十年的无长期联合术率从2019年5月22日收集到了一年至十年。主要结果是无长期联合术率,二次结果是不良事件(AE),严重不良事件(SAE)和死亡率。汇集了无随机效应模型的无长期联合术存活和安全措施。计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的差异比率(或)。结果:1,607名患者的15例试验中的数据被提取。在前三年中,汇集或无联的生存率高于Cys(或= 1.59,95%CI:1.11 -2.29,P = 0.012;或= 1.57,95%CI:1.14 - 2.18,P = 0.006;和或= 1.75,95%CI:1.08 - 2.84,P = 0.024;分别为1,2和3年)。然而,从RCT的第四年和RCT亚组的第四年和亚群(或= 1.35,95%CI:0.90-2.01,P = 0.143;或= 1.41,95%CI:0.94 - 2.12,P = 0.096;或= 1.34,95%CI:0.89-2.00,P = 0.157;分别为1,2和3年)。关于不良事件,群体之间的严重不良事件和死亡率没有显着差异。中立联合被证明有试验顺序分析提供动力。结论:然而,观察性研究显示IFX作为更好的选择,根据RCT,选择Cys或IFX作为ASUC的救援治疗,但长期结果并不不同,但有必要进一步大的RCT。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号