首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution >Forest Biodiversity, Carbon Sequestration, and Wood Production: Modeling Synergies and Trade-Offs for Ten Forest Landscapes Across Europe
【24h】

Forest Biodiversity, Carbon Sequestration, and Wood Production: Modeling Synergies and Trade-Offs for Ten Forest Landscapes Across Europe

机译:森林生物多样性,碳封存和木材生产:在欧洲的十个森林景观中建模协同作用和权衡

获取原文
           

摘要

Europe’s forests provide vital habitat for biodiversity and essential ecosystem services whose provision must be sustained or enhanced over the coming century. However, the potential to secure or increase forest ecosystem services, while securing the habitat requirements of taxa remains unclear, especially within the context of uncertain climate and socio-economic developments. To tease out the associated trade-offs and synergies, we used ten case study landscapes within nine countries throughout Europe. Starting with the current status of the forests in the case study landscapes, we simulated forest development one hundred years into the future. Simulations were embedded in three combined climate and socio-economic frame scenarios based on global and European policies which varied in their climate change mitigation efficiency. Scenarios were translated into country specific projections of climate variables, and resultant demands for wood products. Forest management regimes were projected to vary in response to these scenarios at local scales. The specific combinations of alternative forest management practices were based on parallel research and input from local forest stakeholders. For each case study, a specific forest growth simulator was used. In general, the climate scenarios applied did not cause fundamentally different ecosystem service outputs at the case study level. Our results revealed almost no reduction in outcomes for biodiversity indicators with an increase in wood production, and in some cases synergistic results occurred when diversity was actively promoted as part of the management concept. Net carbon uptake was not strongly correlated with biodiversity, indicating that biodiversity-friendly forest management doesn’t need to curtail carbon sequestration. Notably, we obtained heterogeneous results for the relation between sustainable wood production and net carbon uptake. Most scenarios resulted in a more or less reduced net carbon uptake over the long term, often due to stand age class distribution shifts. Levels of sustainable wood production varied widely during the simulation period, from significant increases (Sweden, Lithuania) to minor changes (Slovakia, Turkey) and slight decreases (Ireland, Netherlands). We place our results within the larger context of European forest policy and the challenges of simulating and contrasting forest biodiversity and the ecosystem services that societies depend on.
机译:欧洲的森林为生物多样性和基本生态系统服务提供了重要栖息地,其规定必须在未来世纪持续或加强。但是,潜力能够确保或增加森林生态系统服务,同时确保了分类群的栖息地要求尚不清楚,特别是在不确定的气候和社会经济发展的背景下。为了挑剔相关的权衡和协同作用,我们在欧洲九个国家使用十个案例研究景观。在案例研究景观中,从森林的现状开始,我们将森林开发融入未来。基于全球和欧洲政策的三个综合气候和社会经济框架情景嵌入了仿真,这些政策在气候变化缓解效率下变化。情景被翻译成气候变量的国家特定预测,并为木材产品的需求。预计森林管理制度旨在因本地尺度的这些情景而有所不同。替代森林管理实践的具体组合是基于当地森林利益相关者的平行研究和投入。对于每种情况,使用特定的森林生长模拟器。一般而言,应用的气候情景在案例研究水平上不会引起根本不同的生态系统服务输出。我们的结果透露,生物多样性指标的结果几乎没有减少,随着木材生产的增加,在某些情况下,在积极促进各种经营理念的一部分时发生协同效果。净碳吸收与生物多样性没有强烈相关,表明生物多样性型森林管理不需要缩减碳封存。值得注意的是,我们获得了可持续木材生产与净碳的关系的异质结果。大多数情景导致长期的净碳吸收或多或少地减少了净碳吸收,通常是由于阶段阶级分布班次。在模拟期间,可持续的木材生产水平在仿真期间多种多样,从大幅增加(瑞典,立陶宛)到轻微的变化(斯洛伐克,土耳其)和轻微减少(爱尔兰,荷兰)。我们将业绩放在欧洲森林政策的更大背景下以及模拟和造成森林生物多样性的挑战以及社会依赖的生态系统服务。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号