首页> 外文期刊>Forecasting >Are Combined Tourism Forecasts Better at Minimizing Forecasting Errors?
【24h】

Are Combined Tourism Forecasts Better at Minimizing Forecasting Errors?

机译:组合旅游在最大限度地降低预测错误时更好地预测?

获取原文
           

摘要

This study, which was contracted by the European Commission and is geared towards easy replicability by practitioners, compares the accuracy of individual and combined approaches to forecasting tourism demand for the total European Union. The evaluation of the forecasting accuracies was performed recursively (i.e., based on expanding estimation windows) for eight quarterly periods spanning two years in order to check the stability of the outcomes during a changing macroeconomic environment. The study sample includes Eurostat data from January 2005 until August 2017, and out of sample forecasts were calculated for the last two years for three and six months ahead. The analysis of the out-of-sample forecasts for arrivals and overnights showed that forecast combinations taking the historical forecasting performance of individual approaches such as Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models, REGARIMA models with different trend variables, and Error Trend Seasonal (ETS) models into account deliver the best results.
机译:本研究由欧盟委员会承包并通过从业者易于复制,比较了个人和综合方法对欧洲联盟的旅游需求的准确性。递归(即,基于扩展估计窗口)进行预测精度的评估,持续两年的季度期间,以检查在变化的宏观经济环境期间结果的稳定性。研究示例包括2005年1月至2017年8月的欧盟统计数据数据,并在过去两年中计算出样品预测,持续三年和六个月。对抵达和过夜的样本外预测的分析表明,预测组合采用归属化综合移动平均(ARIMA)模型,具有不同趋势变量的Regarima模型等各个方法的历史预测性能,以及错误趋势季节性(ETS )模型考虑到最佳结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号