首页> 外文期刊>Geoscientific Model Development Discussions >Assessment of sub-shelf melting parameterisations using the ocean–ice-sheet coupled model NEMO(v3.6)–Elmer/Ice(v8.3)
【24h】

Assessment of sub-shelf melting parameterisations using the ocean–ice-sheet coupled model NEMO(v3.6)–Elmer/Ice(v8.3)

机译:使用海洋冰片耦合模型Nemo(V3.6) - elmer /冰(V8.3)评估子货架熔融参数化的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Oceanic melting beneath ice shelves is the main driver of the current mass loss of the Antarctic ice sheet and is mostly parameterised in stand-alone ice-sheet modelling. Parameterisations are crude representations of reality, and their response to ocean warming has not been compared to 3-D ocean–ice-sheet coupled models. Here, we assess various melting parameterisations ranging from simple scalings with far-field thermal driving to emulators of box and plume models, using a new coupling framework combining the ocean model NEMO and the ice-sheet model Elmer/Ice. We define six idealised one-century scenarios for the far-field ocean ranging from cold to warm, and representative of potential futures for typical Antarctic ice shelves. The scenarios are used to constrain an idealised geometry of the Pine Island glacier representative of a relatively small cavity. Melt rates and sea-level contributions obtained with the parameterised stand-alone ice-sheet model are compared to the coupled model results. The plume parameterisations give good results for cold scenarios but fail and underestimate sea level contribution by tens of percent for warm(ing) scenarios, which may be improved by adapting its empirical scaling. The box parameterisation with five boxes compares fairly well to the coupled results for almost all scenarios, but further work is needed to grasp the correct number of boxes. For simple scalings, the comparison to the coupled framework shows that a quadratic as opposed to linear dependency on thermal forcing is required. In addition, the quadratic dependency is improved when melting depends on both local and non-local, i.e. averaged over the ice shelf, thermal forcing. The results of both the box and the two quadratic parameterisations fall within or close to the coupled model uncertainty. All parameterisations overestimate melting for thin ice shelves while underestimating melting in deep water near the grounding line. Further work is therefore needed to assess the validity of these melting parameteriations in more realistic set-ups.
机译:冰架下的海洋熔化是南极冰盖电流损失的主要驱动器,大多数在独立的冰板造型中。参数化是现实的原油表示,并且他们对海洋变暖的反应尚未与3-D海洋冰床耦合模型进行比较。在这里,我们评估了各种熔融参数,从简单的缩放到具有远场热驱动到盒子和羽流模型的仿真器,采用新的耦合框架,将海洋模型Nemo和冰板模型Elmer /冰结合在一起。我们为远场海洋的六个理想化的一世纪情景定义为从寒冷到温暖的远场,以及典型南极冰架的潜在期货的代表。这种情况用于限制代表相对小腔的松树岛冰川的理想几何形状。将参数化独立冰片模型获得的熔体速率和海平贡献与耦合模型结果进行比较。 Plume参数化对冷情景提供了良好的结果,但通过调整其实证缩放可以改善,对冷方案进行了变化和低估了海平面的贡献,这可以通过调整其实证缩放来改善。具有五个盒子的盒子参数化对几乎所有场景的耦合结果相比很好地比较,但需要进一步的工作来掌握正确数量的盒子。对于简单的缩放,与耦合框架的比较表明,需要对与线性依赖性的直线依赖是必需的。另外,当熔化取决于局部和非局部时,即在冰架上平均,热迫使,改善了二次依赖性。盒子和两个二次参数化的结果落入或接近耦合模型不确定性。所有参数化融合薄冰架的熔化,同时低估了在接地线附近深水中熔化的熔化。因此需要进一步的工作来评估这些熔点参数的有效性,更现实的设置。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号