...
首页> 外文期刊>Geoscientific Model Development Discussions >Land surface model parameter optimisation using in situ flux data: comparison of gradient-based versus random search algorithms (a case study using ORCHIDEE v1.9.5.2)
【24h】

Land surface model parameter optimisation using in situ flux data: comparison of gradient-based versus random search algorithms (a case study using ORCHIDEE v1.9.5.2)

机译:陆地表面模型参数优化使用原位助焊剂数据:基于梯度的与随机搜索算法的比较(使用orchidee v1.9.5.2的案例研究)

获取原文
           

摘要

Land surface models (LSMs), which form the land component of earth system models, rely on numerous processes for describing carbon, water and energy budgets, often associated with highly uncertain parameters. Data assimilation (DA) is a useful approach for optimising the most critical parameters in order to improve model accuracy and refine future climate predictions. In this study, we compare two different DA methods for optimising the parameters of seven plant functional types (PFTs) of the ORCHIDEE LSM using daily averaged eddy-covariance observations of net ecosystem exchange and latent heat flux at 78 sites across the globe. We perform a technical investigation of two classes of minimisation methods – local gradient-based (the L-BFGS-B algorithm, limited memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno algorithm with bound constraints) and global random search (the genetic algorithm) – by evaluating their relative performance in terms of the model–data fit and the difference in retrieved parameter values. We examine the performance of each method for two cases: when optimising parameters at each site independently (“single-site” approach) and when simultaneously optimising the model at all sites for a given PFT using a common set of parameters (“multi-site” approach). We find that for the single site case the random search algorithm results in lower values of the cost function (i.e. lower model–data root mean square differences) than the gradient-based method; the difference between the two methods is smaller for the multi-site optimisation due to a smoothing of the cost function shape with a greater number of observations. The spread of the cost function, when performing the same tests with 16 random first-guess parameters, is much larger with the gradient-based method, due to the higher likelihood of being trapped in local minima. When using pseudo-observation tests, the genetic algorithm results in a closer approximation of the true posterior parameter value in the L-BFGS-B algorithm. We demonstrate the advantages and challenges of different DA techniques and provide some advice on using it for the LSM parameter optimisation.
机译:陆地表面模型(LSM),形成地球系统模型的土地成分,依靠众多方法来描述碳,水和能源预算,通常与高度不确定的参数相关。数据同化(DA)是一种优化最关键参数的有用方法,以提高模型准确性和细化未来的气候预测。在本研究中,我们比较了两种不同的DA方法,用于优化陆域LSM的七种植物功能类型(PFT)的参数使用每日平均涡流的eDy-Covariance观察净生态系统交换和潜热通量的次数在全球的78个地点。我们对两类最小化方法进行技术调查 - 基于局部梯度(L-BFGS-B算法,有限的内存泡沫 - 荧光仪 - Goldfarb-Shanno算法,带有束缚约束)和全局随机搜索(遗传算法) - by在模型数据拟合方面评估它们的相对性能和检索的参数值的差异。我们检查每个方法的每个方法的性能:在独立地优化每个站点的参数(“单站点”方法)时,并且在使用常见的参数集(“多站点”(“多站点)的给定PFT的所有站点上优化模型时(”多站点“ 方法)。我们发现,对于单个站点的情况,随机搜索算法导致成本函数的较低值(即,更低的模型 - 数据根均方差异)而不是基于梯度的方法;由于成本函数形状的平滑,两种方法之间的差异较小,对于具有更多观测的成本函数形状,对于成本函数形状的平滑。由于在基于梯度的方法中捕获局部最小值的较高可能性,在执行与16个随机的先猜测参数的相同测试时,成本函数的传播比基于梯度的方法更大。当使用伪观察测试时,遗传算法导致L-BFGS-B算法中真正的后后参数值的近似近似。我们展示了不同DA技术的优势和挑战,并为LSM参数优化提供了一些建议。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号