首页> 外文期刊>Genealogy >Writing Belonging: An Antillean Conversation Between Luisa Capetillo and Ofelia Rodríguez Acosta
【24h】

Writing Belonging: An Antillean Conversation Between Luisa Capetillo and Ofelia Rodríguez Acosta

机译:写作属于:Luisa Capetillo和OfeliaRodríguezCacosta之间的安提琴对话

获取原文
           

摘要

This essay comparatively reads the intellectual contributions of Luisa Capetillo and Ofelia Rodrguez Acosta. I argue that Capetillo and Rodrguez Acosta offer unique and under-appreciated perspectives on what I term the assemblages of belonging that resist the regulatory normalization of sexuality and the reduction of the maternal body as the source of home and place making in the context of Puerto Rico and Cuba respectively. As the paper demonstrates, what it means to belong, in the context of Antillean women writers, is not entirely tied to a particular place or the identity of people. Rather, belonging is assembled through tactics that are always already decentered given the status of womanhood and its interpellations in the Caribbean at the turn of the 20th century, which was performatively accomplished through the acts of writing and reading. I argue that Capetillo and Rodrguez Acosta assemble notions of belonging through performative mechanisms that place them at the cross-roads between the affective, embodied, and relational dimensions of what it means to belong in a place that is not and continues not to be for any(body). Thus, they both betray the idea of being on one side or another.
机译:这篇论文相对读了Luisa Capetillo和Ofelia Rodrguez Acosta的智力贡献。我争辩说,Capetillo和Rodrguez Acosta提供独特而不受赞赏的观点,归属于抵制性行为的监管标准化和母体减少作为家庭的来源以及在波多黎各制作的情况下和古巴分别。随着论文的表现形式,在安提琴妇女作家的背景下属于归属,并不完全依赖于人民的特定地点或身份。相反,归属于鉴于20世纪之交的女性职位及其在加勒比地区的地位,始终已经过策略的策略组装,这是通过写作和阅读的行为表演完成的。我认为Capetillo和Rodrguez Acosta通过表演机制将归属的概念组装在情感,体现和关系方面的交叉路之间,其意味着属于不是并且继续不适合任何的地方(身体)。因此,他们都背叛了一方或另一方的想法。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号