首页> 外文期刊>Evolution >Measuring evolution acceptance using the GAENE: influences of gender, race, degree-plan, and instruction
【24h】

Measuring evolution acceptance using the GAENE: influences of gender, race, degree-plan, and instruction

机译:使用Gaene测量进化接受:性别,种族,学位计划和教学的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

The evolution education research community has defined the construct of evolution acceptance in different ways and measured it using different instruments. One of these instruments the GAENE has not been analyzed across different student populations, demographic groups, degree plans, and instructional treatments. Such comparisons are crucial for examining whether the inferences drawn from instrument measures are valid, reliable, and generalizable. In this study, we attempt to replicate findings produced in the original validation study and explore aspects of the instrument not previously examined. We use Rasch analysis to study a large sample (n 700) of undergraduates enrolled in standard introductory biology classes in the Northeastern USA. Participants completed the GAENE pre- and post-course for two semesters, and the MATE pre- and post-course for one semester. We assessed dimensionality, reliability, item fit, and rating scale functioning. We used regression analyses and generalized eta squared to evaluate the contribution of demographic and background variables to pre-course measures and pre-post course acceptance gains. Our analyses of GAENE dimensionality and item properties were generally in line with prior work, including the finding that particular items displayed psychometric problems. Surprisingly, GAENE measures did not differ between biology majors and non-majors. Evolution instruction produced significant but small pre-post improvements in GAENE measures. GAENE measures were significantly associated with MATE measures (0.68 0.80). White and male participants had the highest evolution acceptance measures using both the MATE and the GAENE; race had a much stronger contribution to MATE measures as compared to GAENE measures. Race and gender acceptance differences were found to be as large as the differences produced in response to evolution instruction. Overall measures of acceptance change will be similar, but not identical, using the MATE and the GAENE. We make several recommendations for the modification or removal of some GAENE items, as well as future research directions for the measurement of evolution acceptance.
机译:进化教育研究界已经以不同的方式定义了演进接受的构建,并使用不同的仪器测量。这些仪器之一盖恩尚未在不同的学生群体,人口统计,学位计划和教学治疗中分析。这种比较对于检查从仪器措施汲取的推论是否有效,可靠和更广泛的情况至关重要。在这项研究中,我们试图复制在原始验证研究中产生的结果,并探索未以前检查的仪器的方面。我们使用RASCH分析研究美国东北部的标准介绍生物课程的大型样本(N> 700)。参与者完成了两个学期的高级和课程,以及一个学期的伴侣前和课程。我们评估了维度,可靠性,项目适合度和评级规模运行。我们使用回归分析和广义的ETA Squared以评估人口统计和背景变量对前列前措施和岗位前课程接受收益的贡献。我们对Gaene维品和物品属性的分析通常与事先工作一致,包括发现特定项目显示心理问题的问题。令人惊讶的是,Gaene措施与生物专业和非专业之间没有差异。 Evolution教学产生了高度但小的高级措施预改善。 Gaene措施与伴侣措施显着相关(0.68 0.80)。白色和男性参与者使用伴侣和盖恩的进化验收措施最高;与高保真措施相比,种族对伴侣措施进行了更强大的贡献。比赛和性别接受差异被发现与响应进化指令产生的差异一样大。使用伴侣和盖恩将相似但不相同,接受变化的总体措施将相似。我们为修改或删除一些高级物品以及减少演进验收的研究方向进行了若干建议。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号