...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Management and prognosis of acute traumatic cervical central cord syndrome: systematic review and Spinal Cord Society Spine Trauma Study Group position statement
【24h】

Management and prognosis of acute traumatic cervical central cord syndrome: systematic review and Spinal Cord Society Spine Trauma Study Group position statement

机译:急性创伤性宫颈中心脐综合征的管理与预后:系统评论和脊髓社会脊柱创伤研究组位置陈述

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Spinal Cord Society (SCS) and Spine Trauma Study Group (STSG) established a panel tasked with reviewing management and prognosis of acute traumatic cervical central cord syndrome (ATCCS) and recommend a consensus statement for its management. A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA 2009 guidelines. Delphi method was used to identify key research questions and achieve consensus. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched for corresponding keywords. The initial search retrieved 770 articles of which 37 articles dealing with management, timing of surgery, complications or prognosis of ATCCS were identified. The literature review and draft position statements were compiled and circulated to panel members. The draft was modified incorporating relevant suggestions to reach consensus.Out of 37 studies, 15 were regarding management strategy, ten regarding timing of surgery and 12 regarding prognosis of ATCCS.There is reasonable evidence that patients with ATCCS secondary to vertebral fracture, dislocation, traumatic disc herniation or instability have better outcomes with early surgery ( 24h). In patients of ATCCS secondary to extension injury in stenotic cervical canal without fracture/fracture dislocation/traumatic disc herniation/instability, there is requirement of high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials to resolve controversy regarding early surgery versus conservative management and delayed surgery if recovery plateaus or if there is a neurological deterioration. Until such time decision on surgery and its timing should be left to the judgment of physician, deliberating on pros and cons relevant to the particular patient and involving the well-informed patient and relatives in decision making. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
机译:脊髓社会(SCS)和脊柱创伤研究组(STSG)建立了一个小组任务,审查了急性创伤性宫颈中心脊髓综合征(ATCC)的管理和预后,并建议其管理层达成共识声明。根据PRISMA 2009的指导方针进行系统审查。 Delphi方法用于识别关键研究问题并实现共识。 PubMed,Scopus和Google Scholar搜索相应的关键字。识别初始搜索检索到770篇文章,其中鉴定了处理管理,手术,并发症或ATCCS的并发症或预后的37篇文章。文献审查和起草职位陈述是编制和分发给小组成员。该草案加入了纳入相关建议,以达成37项研究,有关37项研究,有关管理策略,有关手术的时序,有关ATCCS预后的第12项。合理证据表明ATCCS患者患有椎骨骨折,脱臼症椎间盘突出或不稳定具有早期手术(<24h)的更好的结果。在没有断裂/断裂脱位/创伤椎间盘突出/创伤椎间盘突出/创伤性椎间盘突出/稳定性的患者患者中,延伸损伤,需要高质量的前瞻性随机对照试验,以解决关于早期手术与保守管理和延迟手术的争议,如果复苏平稳或者如果存在神经系统恶化。直到手术的这种时间决定及其时序应留给医生的判断,审议与特定患者有关的利弊,并涉及明智的患者和决策中的亲属。这些幻灯片可以在电子补充材料下检索。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号