首页> 外文期刊>Environmental health and preventive medicine >A comparative study of international and Chinese public health emergency management from the perspective of knowledge domains mapping
【24h】

A comparative study of international and Chinese public health emergency management from the perspective of knowledge domains mapping

机译:从知识域映射视角下的国际和中国公共卫生应急管理的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

At the end of 2019, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severely damaged and endangered people’s lives. The public health emergency management system in China has played an essential role in handling the response to the outbreak, which has been appreciated by the World Health Organization and some countries. Hence, it is necessary to conduct an overall analysis of the development of the health emergency management system in China. This can provide a reference for scholars to aid in understanding the current situation and to reveal new research topics. We collected 2247 international articles from the Web of Science database and 959 Chinese articles from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database. Bibliometric and mapping knowledge domain analysis methods were used in this study for temporal distribution analysis, cooperation network analysis, and co-word network analysis. The first international article in this field was published in 1991, while the first Chinese article was published in 2005. The research institutions producing these studies mainly existed in universities and health organizations. Developed countries and European countries published the most articles overall, while eastern China published the most articles within China. There were 52 burst words for international articles published from 1999–2018 and 18 burst words for Chinese articles published from 2003–2018. International top-ranked articles according to the number of citations appeared in 2005, 2007, 2009, 2014, 2015, and 2016, while the corresponding Chinese articles appeared in 2003, 2004, 2009, and 2011. There are differences in the regional and economic distribution of international and Chinese cooperation networks. International research is often related to timely issues mainly by focusing on emergency preparedness and monitoring of public health events, while China has focused on public health emergencies and their disposition. International research began on terrorism and bioterrorism, followed by disaster planning and emergency preparedness, epidemics, and infectious diseases. China considered severe acute respiratory syndrome as the starting research background and the legal system construction as the research starting point, which was followed by the mechanism, structure, system, and training abroad for public health emergency management.
机译:截至2019年底,2019年冠状病毒疾病爆发(Covid-19)严重受损和濒危人民的生命。中国的公共卫生应急管理系统在处理对爆发的反应方面发挥了重要作用,这是世界卫生组织和一些国家的赞赏。因此,有必要对中国健康应急管理系统的发展进行全面分析。这可以为学者提供参考,以帮助理解目前的情况,并揭示新的研究主题。从中国国家知识基础设施数据库中收集了来自科学数据库网络的2247篇国际文章和959篇中国文章。本研究在本研究中使用了尺寸计和映射知识域分析方法,用于时间分布分析,合作网络分析和共同词网络分析。该领域的第一个国际文章于1991年出版,而第一条中国文章于2005年出版。生产这些研究的研究机构主要存在于大学和卫生组织中。发达国家和欧洲国家全面发布了最多的文章,而中国东部发表了中国最多的文章。从1999-2018年出版的国际文章有52个爆裂词,为2003 - 2018年发表的中国文章18个爆发词汇。国际排名第一的文章根据引文的数量出现在2005年,2007年,2009年,2014年,2015年和2016年,而相应的中国文章出现在2003年,2004年,2009年和2011年。区域和经济存在差异国际与中国合作网络的分布。国际研究往往是与关注公共卫生活动的紧急准备和监测的及时问题,而中国专注于公共卫生紧急情况及其处置。国际研究开始于恐怖主义和生物恐怖主义,其次是灾害计划和应急准备,流行病和传染病。中国认为严重急性呼吸综合征是作为研究起点的起始研究背景和法律制度建设,其后是公共卫生应急管理的机制,结构,制度和培训。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号