...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of endocrinology >Risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on the 2013 WHO criteria
【24h】

Risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on the 2013 WHO criteria

机译:基于2013年谁的标准,妊娠期糖尿病的危险因素筛查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ObjectiveSince many European countries use risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), we aimed to determine the performance of selective screening for GDM based on the 2013 WHO criteria.Design and methodsOverall, 1811 women received universal screening with a 75?g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with GDM in 12.5% ( n ?=?231) women based on the 2013 WHO criteria. We retrospectively applied different European selective screening guidelines to this cohort and evaluated the performance of different clinical risk factors to screen for GDM.ResultsBy retrospectively applying the English, Irish, French and Dutch guidelines for selective screening, respectively 28.5% ( n ?=?526), 49.7% ( n ?=?916), 48.5% ( n ?=?894) and 50.7% ( n ?=?935) had at least one risk factor, with GDM prevalence of respectively 6.5% ( n ?=?120), 7.9% ( n ?=?146), 8.0% ( n ?=?147) and 8.4% ( n ?=?154). Using maternal age ≥30 and/or BMI ≥25 for screening, positive rate was 69.9% ( n ?=?1288), GDM prevalence 10.2% ( n ?=?188), sensitivity 81.4% (CI: 75.8–86.2%) and specificity 31.8% (CI: 29.5–34.1%). Adding other clinical risk factors did not improve detection. GDM women without risk factors had more neonatal hypoglycemia (14.4 vs 4.0%, P ?=?0.001) and labor inductions (39.7 vs 25.9%, P ?=?0.020) than normal-glucose tolerant women, and less cesarean sections than GDM women with risk factors (13.8 vs 31.0%, P ?=?0.010).ConclusionsBy applying selective screening by European guidelines, about 50% of women would need an OGTT with the lowest number of missed cases (33%) by the Dutch guidelines. Screening with age ≥30 years and/or BMI ≥25, reduced the number of missed cases to 18.6% but 70% would need an OGTT.
机译:许多欧洲国家使用风险因素筛查妊娠期糖尿病(GDM),我们旨在确定基于2013年谁标准的GDM选择性筛选的表现.Design和Probledroverall,1811名女性接受了75μl口服葡萄糖的通用筛查在12.5%(n?= 231)妇女基于2013年标准的妇女,耐受性测试(ogtt)。我们回顾性地应用于这种队列的不同欧洲选择性筛选指南,并评估了不同临床风险因素对GDM的筛选的性能。追溯应用英语,爱尔兰语,法语和荷兰语和荷兰选择性筛查指南,分别为28.5%(n?=?526 ),49.7%(n?=α916),48.5%(n?=Δ894)和50.7%(n?= 935)具有至少一个风险因素,分别为6.5%的GDM流行率(n?=? 120),7.9%(n?=α146),8.0%(n?=Δ147)和8.4%(n?=?154)。使用母体年龄≥30和/或BMI≥25进行筛选,阳性率为69.9%(n?= 1288),GDM患病率为10.2%(n?= 188),灵敏度81.4%(CI:75.8-86.2%)特异性31.8%(CI:29.5-34.1%)。添加其他临床风险因素没有改善检测。没有危险因素的GDM妇女具有更多新生儿低血糖症(14.4 vs 4.0%,P?= 0.001)和劳动诱导(39.7 vs 25.9%,p?= 0.020),而不是正常葡萄糖耐受性妇女,比GDM女性更少的剖宫产患有风险因素(13.8 vs 31.0%,p?= 0.010)。适用欧洲指南的选择性筛查的组合,约有50%的女性需要荷兰指南的错过案件数量最低的ogtt(33%)。筛选年龄≥30岁和/或BMI≥25,减少错过案件的数量为18.6%,但70%需要一个ogtt。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号