...
首页> 外文期刊>ESC Heart Failure >Utility of single‐item questions to assess physical inactivity in patients with chronic heart failure
【24h】

Utility of single‐item questions to assess physical inactivity in patients with chronic heart failure

机译:单项问题的效用评估慢性心力衰竭患者的身体不活跃

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of two single‐item self‐report (SR) questions to assess physical inactivity in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods and results This is a cross‐sectional study using data from 106 patients with HF equipped with accelerometers for 1?week each. Two SR items relating to physical activity were also collected. Correlations between accelerometer activity counts and the SR items were analysed. Patients were classified as physically active or inactive on the basis of accelerometer counts, and the SR items were used to try to predict that classification. Finally, patients were classified as having high self‐reported physical activity or low self‐reported physical activity, on the basis of the SR items, and the resulting groups were analysed for differences in actual physical activity. There were significant but weak correlations between the SR items and accelerometer counts: ρ?=?0.24, P?=?0.016 for SR1 and ρ?=?0.21, P?=?0.033 for SR2. Using SR items to predict whether a patient was physically active or inactive produced an area under the curve of 0.62 for SR1, with a specificity of 92% and a sensitivity of 30%. When dividing patients into groups on the basis of SR1, there was a significant difference of 1583 steps per day, or 49% more steps in the high self‐reported physical activity group (P??0.001). Conclusions There might be utility in the single SR question for high‐specificity screening of large populations to identify physically inactive patients in order to assign therapeutic interventions efficiently where resources are limited.
机译:目的本研究的目的是探讨两个单项自我报告(SR)问题的效用,以评估心力衰竭(HF)患者的物理不活跃。方法和结果这是使用106例HF配备加速度计的106名患者的数据进行横截面研究。还收集了与身体活动有关的两个SR项目。分析加速度计活动计数与SR项目之间的相关性。在加速度计数的基础上,患者被归类为物理活跃或无效,并且使用SR物品来试图预测该分类。最后,患者在SR项目的基础上被归类为具有高自我报告的身体活动或低自我报告的身体活动,并分析所得基团的实际身体活动的差异。 SR物品与加速度计之间有显着但弱相关性:ρ?=?0.24,p?= 0.016用于SR1和ρα=Δ= 0.21,P?= 0.033用于SR2。使用SR物品预测患者是否物理活性或非活性为SR1的曲线下产生的区域,特异性为92%,灵敏度为30%。将患者分成基于SR1时,每天1583个步骤差异,高自我报告的物理活性组(P?<0.001)中有49%以下。结论在单一的SR问题中可能存在效用,用于大群的高特异性筛查,以识别身体不活跃的患者,以便有效地在资源有限的地方分配治疗干预措施。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号