...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental sciences Europe >Understanding the origins and variability of the fuel consumption gap: lessons learned from laboratory tests and a real-driving campaign
【24h】

Understanding the origins and variability of the fuel consumption gap: lessons learned from laboratory tests and a real-driving campaign

机译:了解燃料消耗差距的起源和可变性:从实验室测试中汲取的经验教训和真正的驾驶活动

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Divergence in fuel consumption (FC) between the type-approval tests and real-world driving trips, known also as the FC gap, is a well-known issue and Europe is preparing the field for tackling it. The present study focuses on the monitoring of the FC of a single vehicle throughout 1?year with 20 different drivers and almost 14,000?km driven with the aim to analyze and quantify the true intrinsic variability in the FC gap coming from environmental and traffic conditions and driving factors. In addition, the regression model has been developed to evaluate the importance of these different factors on the FC gap’s variability. The 1-year FC gap measured in this study was 29% while driver’s averages were in the range from 16 to 106%. The regression model developed had $$R^,$$ equal to 90.4 meaning that more than 90% of the FC gap’s variance can be explained with this model and factors measured in this study. The results of the model showed that among all factors analyzed the highest contribution in the FC gap’s variance is coming from the average vehicle speed (16.6%), followed by the road grade (13.4%), and trip distance (10.1%). Indeed, the highest FC gaps are measured when the average vehicle speeds were below 20?km/h, the average distance-weighted road grades above 1%, and the trip distances below 5?km. In addition, the impact of driver factors is not negligible (25%) and the highest FC gap is measured for the trips where average positive acceleration was higher than 0.7?m/s2 (indicating aggressive driving) and the electric power demand higher than 800?W. The future lifetime on-board fuel consumption reporting is a crucial instrument that will allow the monitoring of the evolution of the FC gap and ensuring that it does not increase over time. The analysis presented in this study is a basis for setting up a more detailed and refined prediction model, which could assist the European Commission in closely monitoring the gap and the underlying factors generating it.
机译:在批准测试和现实世界驾驶旅行之间的燃料消耗(FC)的分歧,也称为FC Gap,是一个知名的问题,欧洲正在准备解决它的领域。本研究重点介绍,在整个1年内监测单一车辆的FC,其中20个不同的司机和近14,000人的旨在分析和量化来自环境和交通条件的FC间隙中的真实内在变异性。驱动因素。此外,已经开发了回归模型,以评估这些不同因素对FC间隙变异性的重要性。本研究中测量的1年的FC间隙为29%,而驾驶员的平均值在16至106%的范围内。开发的回归模型具有$$ ^,$$等于90.4,这意味着在本研究中测量的该模型和因素可以解释超过90%的FC间隙方差。该模型的结果表明,在所有因素中分析了FC间隙方差的最高贡献,来自平均车速(16.6%),其次是道路等级(13.4%)和跳闸距离(10.1%)。实际上,当平均车辆速度低于20Ωkm / h时,测量最高的Fc间隙,平均距离高于1%的距离,以及低于5Ωkm的行程距离。此外,驱动因子的影响是不可忽略的(25%),并且测量最高的FC间隙对于平均阳性加速度高于0.7μm/ s2(表示攻击驾驶)和电力需求高于800 ?W。未来的寿命燃油消耗报告是一个关键的仪器,可以监测FC间隙的演变,并确保它不会随着时间的推移而增加。本研究中提出的分析是建立更详细和精致的预测模型的基础,这可以协助欧盟委员会密切监测差距和产生的潜在因素。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号