首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Health Insights >Evaluation of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (DuraNet ?) Under laboratory and Semi-Field Conditions Using Experimental Huts Against Anopheles Mosquitoes in Jimma Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia
【24h】

Evaluation of Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (DuraNet ?) Under laboratory and Semi-Field Conditions Using Experimental Huts Against Anopheles Mosquitoes in Jimma Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia

机译:在埃塞俄比亚Jimma区的Jimma区的实验小屋,在实验室和半场条件下评估实验室和半场条件下的持久杀虫网(Duranet

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) efficacy could be compromised due to a lot of influences together with user compliance and vector population insecticide resistance status. Thus, this study was to assess the biological efficacy of DuraNet? with the help of the World Health Organization cone bioassay and field experimental hut. Methods: A laboratory and a semi-field conditions experimental huts against Anopheles Mosquitoes were conducted in southwestern Ethiopia from September 2015 to January 2016. The bio efficacy of DuraNet? was evaluated using the WHO cone bioassay test and then its field efficacy was evaluated using experimental huts against the malaria vector population. Results: World Health Organization cone bioassay tests against pyrethroid-resistant An. arabiensis led to mean percent mortality and knockdown of 78% and 93%, respectively. Washing of DuraNet? successively reduced its efficacy from 93% knockdown (0 wash) to 45% knockdown (20 washes). Similarly, mean mortality decreased from 84% (0 wash) to 47% (20 washes). A total of 1575 female mosquitoes were collected over 40 nights out of which 1373(87.8%) were An. gambiae s.l. , 116 (7.4%) were Anopheles coustani and 107 (6.8%) were An. pharoensis . The mean blood-feeding rate was significantly lower ( P & .001) in hut containing unwashed DuraNet? when compared to hut containing untreated DuraNet?. The mean mortality rate was significantly higher ( P & .001) in hut containing DuraNet? when compared to hut containing untreated DuraNet?. Unwashed DuraNet? showed the highest personal protection 88.7% and 100% against An. Arabiensis and An. pharoensis , respectively. Conclusion: Both DuraNet? and PermaNet 2.0 moderate efficacy against a pyrethroid-resistant population of An. arabiensis from Ethiopia. The bio efficacy of DuraNet? was found below the WHO recommendation. Therefore, the real impact of the observed insecticide resistance against DuraNet? to be further studied under phase-III trials, the need for new alternative vector control tools remains critical.
机译:背景:由于具有许多影响以及用户依从性和载体种群杀虫剂阻力状态,持久的杀虫网(Llins)功效可能会受到损害。因此,这项研究是评估杜兰特的生物学效果吗?在世界卫生组织锥生物测定和现场实验小屋的帮助下。方法:从2015年9月到2016年1月,在埃塞俄比亚西南西南部进行了实验室和半场条件对抗蚊子的实验小屋。杜拉特的生物疗效?使用锥体生物测定试验评估,然后使用针对疟疾载体群体的实验小屋评估其场效应。结果:世界卫生组织锥形生物测定试验抗拟除虫菊酯。 Arabiensis导致占死亡率和78%和93%的折扣。洗涤杜拉特?连续将其从93%的敲低(0洗涤)降低至45%敲低(20次洗涤)。类似地,平均死亡率从84%(0次洗涤)降至47%(20次洗涤)。共收集了1575名女性蚊子,超过40晚,其中1373(87.8%)是一个。 Gambiae S.L. ,116(7.4%)是anopheles coustani,107(6.8%)是一个。 pharoensis。在含有未洗涤的杜兰特的小屋中,平均血液喂养速率显着降低(P& .001)?与包含未经处理的Duranet的小屋相比?含有Duranet的小屋中的平均死亡率明显高于(P& .001)?与包含未经处理的Duranet的小屋相比?未洗过的杜拉特?展示了最高的个人保护88.7%和100%。 rabriensis和一个。分别是甲巨茎。结论:Duranet都是什么?和永久性2.0反对拟滴虫抗性抗性抗性的疗效。来自埃塞俄比亚的阿拉伯群岛。杜拉特的生物疗效?被发现在WHO推荐之下。因此,观察到的杀虫剂抗性的真正影响对抗杜兰特?在第III期试验下进一步研究,对新的替代矢量控制工具的需求仍然至关重要。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号