首页> 外文期刊>Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training >Understanding why apprentices consider dropping out: longitudinal prediction of apprentices’ workplace interest and anxiety
【24h】

Understanding why apprentices consider dropping out: longitudinal prediction of apprentices’ workplace interest and anxiety

机译:理解为什么学徒考虑下降:学徒的纵向预测“学徒的工作场所兴趣和焦虑

获取原文
       

摘要

Although apprenticeships ease the school-to-work transition for youth, many apprentices seriously consider dropping out. While associated with noncompletions, dropout considerations are important to study in their own right, because they reflect a negative quality of apprenticeship experience and can impact apprentices’ quality of learning and engagement. Few studies have addressed apprentices’ dropout considerations using comprehensive theoretical frameworks. To address this gap, this study examined how apprentices’ interest and anxiety growth trajectories predicted dropout considerations and associated with perceived resources and demands, grounded in expectancy-value theory (EVT) and the job demands-resources (JD-R) model. Australian apprentices ( N ?=?2387) were surveyed at 6-month intervals utilising an accelerated longitudinal design, on their workplace interest and anxiety, job-related resources (role model, timing of choice, employer teaching, expertise, job security, and training wages) and demands (lack of information, career indecision, and excessive work). Latent growth models (LGM) within a structural equation modelling framework showed apprentices began with high interest which declined over time, and low anxiety which increased in the latter half of their first year until the end of their second year. Apprentices’ dropout considerations were predicted by initial interest and anxiety levels (at the beginning of their apprenticeship), and by interest losses during their apprenticeship (but, not by increases in anxiety). Almost half the variance in interest and anxiety trajectories was explained by apprentices’ perceived resources and demands: resources had a greater effect on promoting interest than reducing anxiety, whereas demands were more important in exacerbating anxiety.
机译:虽然学徒措施缓解了青年的学校工作过渡,但许多学徒认真考虑辍学。虽然与非算法相关,但辍学考虑对于自己的权利很重要,因为它们反映了学徒经验的负面质量,可以影响学徒的学习和参与的质量。很少有研究通过综合理论框架解决了学徒的辍学考虑因素。为了解决这一差距,本研究审查了学徒的兴趣和焦虑生长轨迹如何预测辍学考虑和与感知资源和需求相关,基于预期价值理论(EVT)和工作要求 - 资源(JD-R)模型。澳大利亚学徒(N?= 2387)以6个月的时间间隔,利用加速的纵向设计,在其工作场所兴趣和焦虑,职位相关资源(职位模型,选择,选择,雇主教学,专业知识,工作保障和工作保障和培训工资)和要求(缺乏信息,职业犹豫不决和过度工作)。结构方程建模框架内的潜在增长模型(LGM)显示学徒始于高兴的兴趣,随着时间的推移而下降,并且在第一年的后半年后半年增加的低焦虑率增加到第二年。初始兴趣和焦虑水平(在学徒开始时)预测学徒的辍学考虑,以及在学徒期间的利息损失(但不是通过焦虑的增加)。学徒的感知资源和需求解释了兴趣和焦虑轨迹的几乎一半的差异:资源对促进利息产生了更大的影响,而不是减少焦虑,而需求在加剧焦虑方面更为重要。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号