首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Mental Health Systems >Experiences, opinions and current policies on users’ choice and change of the allocated primary mental health professional: a survey among directors of community mental health centers in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy
【24h】

Experiences, opinions and current policies on users’ choice and change of the allocated primary mental health professional: a survey among directors of community mental health centers in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy

机译:用户选择和改变分配的主要心理健康专业人士的经验,意见和现状:意大利艾米利亚 - 罗马纳地区社区心理健康中心董事的调查

获取原文
           

摘要

The subject of how the initial allocation of the primary mental health professional (PMHP) in community mental health services is made and the frequency and management of users’ requests to choose and/or change their allocated PMHPs has been scarcely investigated. The present paper is aimed at exploring the experiences and opinions of directors of community mental health centers (CMHC) on this topic. A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Electronic ad hoc questionnaires with both multiple choice and open-ended questions were e-mailed to the institutional addresses of CMHC directors in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Northern Italy) with the consent of their heads of department and the Ethical Committee. Quantitative data were analysed by means of Microsoft Excel software and STATA 14.2 (College Station, TX), while the qualitative analysis was performed using the Nvivo12 software. Twenty-eight questionnaires were collected (response rate: 71.8%) that were equally distributed between males and females. For the initial PMHP allocation, casual allocation by “fixed-rota” was commonly performed (39.3%). Moreover, hope for a change of prescription by a different psychiatrist was the most frequent reason for users’ requests to change their PMHP. In two mental health departments only (Parma and Bologna), written guidelines to manage users’ requests of change of PMHP were available. In this context, most participants classified the explored topics as relevant and believed that written policies, especially if shared with users, could be useful. In Emilia-Romagna CMHCs, neither users nor professionals were generally involved in the initial choice of the PMHP. Further national-level studies should be conducted in order to confirm this finding. Additionally, written and shared guidelines for managing users’ request to choose/change their PHMP may be useful.
机译:初始精神卫生专业人员(PMHP)在社区精神卫生服务中如何进行的主题,并对用户选择和/或改变其分配的PMHP的频率和管理已经过分调查。本文旨在探索社区心理健康中心(CMHC)董事的经验和意见。进行了横断面调查。电子临时问卷调查问卷与多项选择和开放式问题通过其部门和伦理委员会同意,通过邮寄到Emilia-Romagna地区(北意大利北部)的CMHC董事的机构地址。通过Microsoft Excel软件和Stata 14.2(大学站,TX)分析了定量数据,而使用NVivo12软件进行定性分析。收集了二十八项问卷(响应率:71.8%),其平等地分布在雄性和女性之间。对于初始PMHP分配,通常进行“固定曲线”的休闲分配(39.3%)。此外,希望通过不同的精神科医师改变处方是用户要求改变PMHP的最常见的原因。在两个心理健康部门(帕尔马和博洛尼亚)中,提供了管理用户改变PMHP的改变请求的书面指南。在这种情况下,大多数参与者将探索主题分为相关的主题并相信书面政策,特别是如果与用户共享,则可能是有用的。在Emilia-Romagna CMHCS中,用户和专业人士通常都没有参与PMHP的初始选择。应进行进一步的国家级研究,以确认这一发现。此外,用于管理用户选择/更改其PHMP的用户请求的书面和共享指南可能很有用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号