首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Mental Health Systems >Community-based psychosocial substance use disorder interventions in low-and-middle-income countries: a narrative literature review
【24h】

Community-based psychosocial substance use disorder interventions in low-and-middle-income countries: a narrative literature review

机译:基于社区的心理社会物质使用低收入国家的障碍干预:叙事文献综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Mental health and substance use disorders (SUDs) are the world’s leading cause of years lived with disability; in low-and-middle income countries (LIMCs), the treatment gap for SUDs is at least 75%. LMICs face significant structural, resource, political, and sociocultural barriers to scale-up SUD services in community settings. This article aims to identify and describe the different types and characteristics of psychosocial community-based SUD interventions in LMICs, and describe what context-specific factors (policy, resource, sociocultural) may influence such interventions in their design, implementation, and/or outcomes. A narrative literature review was conducted to identify and discuss community-based SUD intervention studies from LMICs. Articles were identified via a search for abstracts on the MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete, and PsycINFO databases. A preliminary synthesis of findings was developed, which included a description of the study characteristics (such as setting, intervention, population, target SUD, etc.); thereafter, a thematic analysis was conducted to describe the themes related to the aims of this review. Fifteen intervention studies were included out of 908 abstracts screened. The characteristics of the included interventions varied considerably. Most of the psychosocial interventions were brief interventions. Approximately two thirds of the interventions were delivered by trained lay healthcare workers. Nearly half of the interventions targeted SUDs in addition to other health priorities (HIV, tuberculosis, intimate partner violence). All of the interventions were implemented in middle income countries (i.e. none in low-income countries). The political, resource, and/or sociocultural factors that influenced the interventions are discussed, although findings were significantly limited across studies. Despite this review’s limitations, its findings present relevant considerations for future SUD intervention developers, researchers, and decision-makers with regards to planning, implementing and adapting community-based SUD interventions.
机译:心理健康和物质使用障碍(SUDS)是世界上持续残疾的主要原因;在中低收入国家(LIMCS)中,泡沫的治疗差距至少为75%。 LMICS在社区环境中扩展SUD服务面临着显着的结构,资源,政治和社会文化障碍。本文旨在识别和描述LMIC中基于心理社区的不同类型和特征的不同类型和特征,并描述了哪些上下文特定因素(政策,资源,社会文化)可能会影响其设计,实施和/或结果的这些干预措施。进行了叙述文献综述,以识别并讨论LMICS的社区泡沫干预研究。通过搜索Medline,学术搜索完成和PSYCINFO数据库的摘要来确定文章。开发了初步合成调查结果,其中包括研究特征的描述(例如设定,干预,人口,目标SUD等);此后,进行主题分析以描述与本综述目的相关的主题。 908个摘要中包含十五项干预研究。所附干预的特征很大。大多数心理社会干预都是简短的干预措施。训练有素的保健工作人员提供了大约三分之二的干预措施。除其他健康优先症(艾滋病毒,结核病,亲密的伴侣暴力)外,近一半的干预措施靶向泡沫。所有干预措施都在中等收入国家实施(即,在低收入国家中没有)。讨论了影响干预措施的政治,资源和/或社会文化因素,尽管在研究中显着限制了结果。尽管提供了综述的局限性,其调查结果为未来的苏打干预开发商,研究人员和决策者提供了有关的考虑因素,以规划,实施和调整基于社区的少数干预措施。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号