首页> 外文期刊>Iranian Journal of Radiology >Comparative Study of Three Preoperative Imaging Modalities for the Evaluation and Design of Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap: Color Doppler Ultrasound, Computed Tomography Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography
【24h】

Comparative Study of Three Preoperative Imaging Modalities for the Evaluation and Design of Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap: Color Doppler Ultrasound, Computed Tomography Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography

机译:三种术前成像方式对浅表性环形髂动脉穿孔瓣评价和设计的比较研究:彩色多普勒超声,计算机断层造影和磁共振血管造影

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap is a promising reconstructive candidate for head and neck, trunk and extremity reconstruction. In order to reduce intraoperative errors, preoperative planning is essential for evaluation of the possible variations in vascular anatomy of the groin region. However, the use of these modalities has not been compared. Objectives: The three commonly used imaging modalities (color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) were therefore compared in this study for the relative accuracy in the SCIP flap planning. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted on eight patients who underwent CDUS, CTA and MRA (3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, 3D TOF-MRA) and received reconstructions with the SCIP flaps for head and neck defects. The perforators’ locations, courses and calibers were measured or marked for each flap. These imaging preoperative measurements were later compared with intraoperative findings. Results: CDUS, CTA and 3D TOF-MRA were able to effectively identify the courses of the perforators. 3-dimensional (3D) TOF-MRA was more accurate at measuring the pedicle calibers of SCIP flaps in comparison with CTA and CDUS. Conclusion: Three D-TOF-MRA may be a more valuable imaging modality for the preoperative assessment of the vascular anatomy of SCIP flaps.
机译:背景:浅表环形髂动脉穿孔器(SCIP)襟翼是头部和颈部,躯干和四肢重建的有前途的重建候选者。为了降低术中误差,术前规划对于评估腹股沟区域的血管解剖结构的可能变化至关重要。但是,尚未比较这些方式的使用。目的:在本研究中,在该研究中,在该研究中,三种常用的成像方式(彩色多普勒超声(CDU),计算机断层造影血管造影(CTA)和磁共振血管造影(MRA))在芯片襟翼规划中的相对精度中进行了比较。患者和方法:本研究是在八名接受CDU,CTA和MRA(三维飞行时间磁共振血管造影,3D TOF-MRA)的患者患者中进行的,并通过用于头部和颈部缺陷的刀片襟翼接收到重建。针对每个翼片测量或标记穿孔器的位置,课程和次要。这些成像术前测量后来与术中发现进行了比较。结果:CDU,CTA和3D TOF-MRA能够有效地识别穿孔器的课程。 3维(3D)TOF-MRA在测量与CTA和CDU相比的测量刀片的椎弓根裂解器更准确。结论:三种D-TOF-MRA可能是一种更有价值的成像模型,用于术前评估脊髓瓣的血管解剖学。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号