首页> 外文期刊>Earth Surface Dynamics Discussions >Introducing PebbleCounts: a grain-sizing tool for photo surveys of dynamic gravel-bed rivers
【24h】

Introducing PebbleCounts: a grain-sizing tool for photo surveys of dynamic gravel-bed rivers

机译:介绍PEBBLECOUNTS:动态砾石河河河流照片调查的晶粒尺寸工具

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Grain-size distributions are a key geomorphic metric of gravel-bed rivers. Traditional measurement methods include manual counting or photo sieving, but these are achievable only at the 1–10m2 scale. With the advent of drones and increasingly high-resolution cameras, we can now generate orthoimagery over hectares at millimeter to centimeter resolution. These scales, along with the complexity of high-mountain rivers, necessitate different approaches for photo sieving. As opposed to other image segmentation methods that use a watershed approach, our open-source algorithm, PebbleCounts, relies on k-means clustering in the spatial and spectral domain and rapid manual selection of well-delineated grains. This improves grain-size estimates for complex riverbed imagery, without post-processing. We also develop a fully automated method, PebbleCountsAuto, that relies on edge detection and filtering suspect grains, without the k-means clustering or manual selection steps. The algorithms are tested in controlled indoor conditions on three arrays of pebbles and then applied to 12×1m2 orthomosaic clips of high-energy mountain rivers collected with a camera-on-mast setup (akin to a low-flying drone). A 20-pixel b-axis length lower truncation is necessary for attaining accurate grain-size distributions. For the k-means PebbleCounts approach, average percentile bias and precision are 0.03 and 0.09?ψ, respectively, for ~1.16mmpixel?1 images, and 0.07 and 0.05?ψ for one 0.32mmpixel?1 image. The automatic approach has higher bias and precision of 0.13 and 0.15?ψ, respectively, for ~1.16mmpixel?1 images, but similar values of ?0.06 and 0.05?ψ for one 0.32mmpixel?1 image. For the automatic approach, only at best 70% of the grains are correct identifications, and typically around 50%. PebbleCounts operates most effectively at the 1m2 patch scale, where it can be applied in ~5–10min on many patches to acquire accurate grain-size data over 10–100m2 areas. These data can be used to validate PebbleCountsAuto, which may be applied at the scale of entire survey sites (102–104m2). We synthesize results and recommend best practices for image collection, orthomosaic generation, and grain-size measurement using both algorithms.
机译:粒度分布是一个关键指标地貌砾石床河流。传统的测量方法包括手动计数或照片筛分,但这些是可实现仅在1-10m2规模。随着无人驾驶飞机和越来越高的分辨率的相机的出现,我们现在可以产生正射影像公顷以上在毫米至厘米的分辨率。这些鳞片,与高山区河流的复杂性一起,需要不同的方法进行照片筛分。相对于使用的分水岭方法的其他图像分割方法,我们的开源算法,PebbleCounts,依赖于k均值在空间和谱域和公划定晶粒的快速手动选择聚类。这提高了粒度估计复杂河床影像,无需后期处理。我们还开发了全自动方法,PebbleCountsAuto,依赖于边缘检测和滤波可疑谷物,而不k均值聚类或手动选择的步骤。该算法在控制室内条件下测试卵石的三个阵列,然后施加到12×1平方米与相机上桅杆设置收集高能山河流orthomosaic夹子(类似于一个低飞雄蜂)。一个20像素b轴长度下截断是必要的用于实现准确粒度分布。对于k-均值PebbleCounts接近,平均百分偏差和精度是0.03和0.09?ψ,分别为〜1.16mmpixel?1幅图像,和0.07和0.05?一个0.32mmpixel?1图像ψ。自动方法具有较高的偏置和0.13和0.15〜ψ,分别精度,对于〜1.16mmpixel?1幅图像,但的0.06和0.05?一个0.32mmpixel?1个图像ψ相似的值。对于自动方式,晶粒只在最好的70%是正确的标识,通常在50%左右。 PebbleCounts最有效地在1平方米斑块尺度,它可以在5-10分钟〜被应用在许多补丁在10-100m2领域取得精确的粒度数据进行操作。这些数据可用于验证PebbleCountsAuto,其可在整个调查点(102-104m2)的规模应用。我们综合的结果和建议最佳实践图像采集,orthomosaic发电,并使用两种算法粒度测量。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号