...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >What do you mean “functional” in ecology? Patterns versus processes
【24h】

What do you mean “functional” in ecology? Patterns versus processes

机译:你是什​​么意思的生态学中的“功能”?模式与流程

获取原文

摘要

Use of the term “functional" trait has increased exponentially in ecology. Although accounting for numerous ecological questions, this concept raises several issues. We propose that the term “functional” could be misleading because (1) no rigorous criteria exist to identify “functional” traits and (2) it suggests that only some traits (“functional” ones) can inform our understanding of species functioning, whatever the scale or discipline. Hence, the concept of "functional" trait in ecology is starting to be challenged and it remains unclear why some traits should be considered functional, whereas other traits should not. We argue that the most used “functional” traits are meaningful because they reflect important differences between populations or species, based on synchronic comparisons, that is, irrespective of time (hereafter “pattern” traits). Hence, they are useful for identifying trade‐offs and strategies across large numbers of observations, usually at rather coarse scales, and are most often used in analyses of “big data.” However, given that many ecological processes occur across short time scales and narrow gradients of climate and resource availability, the efficacy of these traits to inform us about these ecological processes appears questionable. We show that trait measurements that take time explicitly into account (hereafter “process” traits) differ from pattern traits because they quantify the flows of material and energy within a given environment across a defined period of time. Although pattern traits and process traits are both functional, it is important to understand the differences between the approaches. Moreover, better accounting of ontogeny, life form, plasticity, and genetic variability is required to enhance the convergence between pattern and process approaches. This revised framework allows more explicit connections between trait ecology and other biological sciences. It should enhance the study of processes at all scales in order to investigate efficiently the adaptive responses of biological organisms to climate change.
机译:使用术语“功能”特征在生态中增加。虽然会计核算众多生态问题,但这一概念提出了几个问题。我们建议术语“功能”可能是误导性的,因为(1)没有存在严格的标准来识别“功能“特征和(2)它表明,只有一些特征(”职能“)可以告知我们对物种的理解,无论规模还是纪律。因此,生态学中的”功能“特征的概念开始受到挑战仍然清楚为什么某些特征应该被认为是功能的,而其他特征不应该。我们认为最常用的“功能”特征是有意义的,因为它们基于同步比较的人口或物种之间的重要差异,即不论时间(此后“模式”特征)。因此,它们对于识别大量观察的权衡和策略,通常是有用的,通常是在相当粗略的尺度上,通常用于分析“大数据”。然而,鉴于许多生态过程发生在短时间尺度和狭窄的气候和资源可用性的较窄梯度上,这些特征通知我们关于这些生态过程的效果似乎是值得怀疑的。我们表明,特质测量,明确考虑到帐户(以下)过程“特征”不同于模式特征,因为它们在定义的时间段内量化给定环境内的材料和能量的流量。虽然模式特征和过程特征都是功能的,但是要了解方法之间的差异是很重要的。此外,需要更好地占组织化,生命形式,可塑性和遗传变异性,以提高模式和过程方法之间的收敛性。该修订的框架允许特质生态和其他生物科学之间的更明确的联系。它应该增强对过程的研究尺度才能有效地调查自适应响应o F生物体对气候变化。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号