首页> 外文期刊>Earth and Space Science >Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Satellite‐Based Rainfall Products Over Various Topographical Unities in Central East Africa: Case of Burundi
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Satellite‐Based Rainfall Products Over Various Topographical Unities in Central East Africa: Case of Burundi

机译:中东地区各种地形成套卫星雨量产品性能的比较分析:布隆迪案例

获取原文
           

摘要

This study aims to evaluate the performance of the Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation with Station observation Version 2 (CHIRPS v2.0), the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Network‐Climate Data Record (PERSIANN‐CDR) and the Climate Research Unit Time Series Version 4 (CRU) products to identify which product delivers reliable rainfall caption over Burundi. The station data with long‐term records have been used as a reference to evaluate the performance of the three products for 34 years ranging from 1983 to 2016. Statistical metrics and precipitation detection capability have been used to measure the accuracy of each product over spatial and time scales. The result analysis carried out that the CHIRPS product has good performance compared to CRU and PERSIANN‐CDR products. It performs well over annual, monthly, and seasonal scales, and it strongly agrees with ground observation over the study domain with the lowest correlation coefficient (CC) = 0.78. The PERSIANN‐CDR product performs poorly over the study domain, though it seems to correlate with in situ rain gauge data in some regions where the CC 0.7. It highly underestimates the rainfall amount for both short rains and long rains. The CRU shows a good performance in most of the regions with CC ≥ 0.74; however, it slightly overestimates rainfall amount over the less wet area including the north and the east regions and highly underestimates the heavy rain over mountainous region. The evaluation at daily scale shows that both CHIRPS and PERSIANN‐CDR moderately perform in most of the regions except the southern and western parts where CC 0.3. The two products exhibit a good detection ability of light rainfall (1 mm/day) but poorly detect heavy rainfall (20 mm/day). The CHIRPS product can deliver reliable and useful information for monitoring meteorological hazards over Burundi.
机译:本研究旨在评估气候危害组红外降水与站观察2(Chirps V2.0)的性能,使用人工神经网络 - 气候数据记录(Persiann-CDR)和气候研究的远程感测信息的降水估计单位时间序列版本4(CRU)产品可识别哪些产品在布隆迪提供可靠的降雨标题。长期记录的站数据已被用作评估从1983年至2016年的三个产品的性能评估34年。统计指标和降水检测能力已被用于测量每个产品在空间和空间上的准确性时间尺度。结果分析进行了与CRU和PERSIANN-CDR产品相比,啁啾产品具有良好的性能。它在年度,月度和季节性尺度上表现出良好,它强烈同意对研究领域的地面观察,相关系数最低(CC)= 0.78。 Persiann-CDR产品在研究领域上表现不佳,尽管似乎与CC> 0.7的某些地区的原位雨量数据相关。它高度低估了短期下雨和长降雨量的降雨量。 CRU在大多数地区显示出良好的性能,CC≥0.74;然而,它略微高估了降雨量,在包括北部和东部地区的潮湿区域,并且高度低估了山区的大雨。日常规模的评估表明,除了南部和西部零件的大多数地区,啁啾和斯利纳 - CDR中度表现为CC <0.3。这两种产品具有良好的降雨量(<1毫米/天)的良好检测能力,但检测到大雨(> 20毫米/天)。 Chirps产品可以提供可靠和有用的信息,以监测布隆迪的气象危害。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号