首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Integrated Care >Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences
【24h】

Shared Decision Making in an Integrated Mental Health and Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention: Stakeholder Practices and Experiences

机译:综合精神卫生和职业康复干预的共享决策:利益攸关方做法和经验

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: A Danish integrated mental health care and vocational intervention was developed to support the return-to-work process for people with common mental disorders. Shared decision making was a core element of the intervention to ensure a person-centred approach. The study aim is to describe how shared decision making was practiced and experienced and to discuss its potential in this integrated care context. Theory and methods: Shared decision making practice and experience was studied in participant observation (n = 20), interviews (n = 12), focus groups interviews (n = 2), and shared plan documents (n = 12). Research methods and analyses were guided by theoretically defined ideals of shared decision making. Results: Shared decision making constituted a general value rather than a structured method in practice. Clients experienced a more person-centred collaboration with professionals, compared to the regular vocational system. Contextual factors regarding vocational legislation and the intervention design influenced the decision latitude. Conclusion: Shared decision making has the potential to support a person-centred approach in integrated services. However, we recommend clarifying decisions applicable for shared decision making, to ensure thorough training, develop and test decision aids, and ensure supportive organisational conditions for shared decision making in interprofessional collaboration.
机译:简介:制定了丹麦综合精神保健和职业干预,以支持具有常见精神障碍的人的回归过程。共享决策是干预的核心要素,以确保以人为本的方法。研究目的是描述如何练习和经历共同决策,并在这种综合护理环境中讨论其潜力。理论与方法:参与者观察中研究了共享决策实践和经验(n = 20),采访(n = 12),焦点小组访谈(n = 2)和共享计划文件(n = 12)。通过理论上定义的共享决策理想,指导了研究方法和分析。结果:共享决策构成了一般价值而不是实践中的结构化方法。与常规职业制度相比,客户与专业人士相比,拥有更为中心的合作。关于职业立法和干预设计的背景因素影响了决策纬度。结论:共享决策有可能支持综合服务中以人为本的方法。但是,我们建议澄清适用于共享决策的决策,以确保彻底培训,开发和测试决策辅助援助,并确保在侦查合作中进行共享决策的支持性组织条件。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号