首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of General Medicine >Status Quo of Diagnostic Procedures and Treatment of Inpatients with Infective Endocarditis at the Department of General Medicine at a University Hospital in a Suburban City in Japan: A Single-Hospital-Based Retrospective Study
【24h】

Status Quo of Diagnostic Procedures and Treatment of Inpatients with Infective Endocarditis at the Department of General Medicine at a University Hospital in a Suburban City in Japan: A Single-Hospital-Based Retrospective Study

机译:日本郊区城市大学医院综合医学系诊断程序及对住院患者治疗入住剂的现状:基于单医院的回顾性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Our hospital’s department of general medicine is often involved in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases that are considered by other hospitals or other departments in our hospital to be difficult to diagnose correctly. Objective: The aim of this study was to clarify how patients with infective endocarditis (IE) being admitted to our hospital’s department of general medicine were examined and treated and to elucidate their prognosis compared with patients admitted to other departments. Materials and Methods: Inpatients of Saga University Hospital with definite IE from September 2007 to August 2017 were divided into 2 groups: those admitted to the general medicine department (the GM group) and those admitted to other departments (the non-GM group). Results: Seventy-four patients were included; 17 (23%) were admitted to the general medicine department. In the GM group, the percentage of patients diagnosed with definite or suspected IE was lower (0% vs 32%, p =0.008), as was the rate of patients with echocardiographic findings that fulfilled the major modified Duke’s criteria (71% vs 98%, p ≤ 0.001), preadmission. The GM group had higher percentages of patients with back or joint pain (41% vs 9%, p =0.001) and complications, including pyogenic spondylitis (35% vs 2%, p ≤ 0.001), deep-seated abscesses (24% vs 5%, p =0.024), pyogenic arthritis (18% vs 0%, p =0.001), and glomerulonephritis (77% vs 37%, p =0.004) than did the non-GM group. Mortality within 30 days of admission to our hospital (12% vs 14%, p =0.753) and overall in-hospital mortality (12% vs 18%, p =0.570) did not significantly differ. Conclusion: The general medicine department could have accurately diagnosed IE, given appropriate treatments, and obtained similar prognoses to those of IE patients treated by other departments, including cardiology and cardiovascular surgery, even in patients for whom diagnosing IE was more difficult or who had less typical echocardiographic findings preadmission.
机译:背景:我们医院的一般医学部往往参与诊断和治疗其他医院或医院其他部门难以正确诊断的疾病。目的:本研究的目的是澄清感染性心内膜炎(IE)的患者被检查和治疗,并与录取其他部门的患者相比,阐明其预后。材料和方法:佐贺大学医院的住院患者有明确的IE从2007年9月至2017年8月分为2组:那些录取普通医学署(GM集团)和录取其他部门(非GM集团)的人。结果:包括七十四名患者; 17(23%)录取了一般医学部门。在GM组中,患有确定或疑似IE的患者的百分比较低(0%vs 32%,p = 0.008),其患有超声心动图的患者的速度,以满足主要改良的公爵的标准(71%VS 98 %,p≤0.001),预吻。 GM组患有较高百分比的背部或关节疼痛(41%vs 9%,p = 0.001)和并发症,包括脓菌脊柱炎(35%vs 2%,p≤0.001),深层脓肿(24%Vs 5%,p = 0.024),卵晶关节炎(18%vs 0%,p = 0.001)和肾小球肾炎(77%vs 37%,p = 0.004),而不是非GM组。在入院后30天内的死亡率(12%vs 14%,P = 0.753)和整体入院死亡率(12%vs 18%,P = 0.570)没有显着差异。结论:普通医学部门可以准确诊断,鉴于适当的治疗,并获得与其他部门治疗的IE患者的患者类似的预期,包括心脏病学和心血管手术,即使在诊断IE更困难或少典型的超声心动图调查结果普雷。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号