...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Multi-joint vs Single-joint Resistance Exercises Induce a Similar Strength Increase in Trained Men: A Randomized Longitudinal Crossover Study
【24h】

Multi-joint vs Single-joint Resistance Exercises Induce a Similar Strength Increase in Trained Men: A Randomized Longitudinal Crossover Study

机译:多关节VS单关节电阻练习诱导训练有素的男性的相似强度增加:随机纵向交叉研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The type of exercise is a relevant resistance training-variable that might be manipulated in order to induce significant increases in muscle strength. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of multi-joint vs single-joint resistance exercises on maximal strength. Sixteen resistance-trained men (age: 23.1 ± 4.4 years; body mass: 86.0 ± 12.8; height: 177.9 ± 6.4 cm; training experience: 4.2 ± 3.4 years) performed one of the following training protocols for six weeks: MULTI, consisting of only multi-joint exercises or SINGLE, consisting of only single-joint exercises. Subjects were then submitted to a three-week washout period, before being submitted to the other protocol for another six weeks. A linear periodization model was adopted in which external load was increased and the repetition range was decreased every two weeks. Maximal dynamic strength of bench press (1RMBENCH) and squat exercises (1RMSQUAT), a percentage variation of total load lifted (?TLL) and internal training load (ITL) were measured. Similar increases in 1RMBENCH (MULTI: 10.8%, p 0.001; SINGLE: 5.5%, p 0.001) and 1RMSQUAT (MULTI: 19.7%, p 0.001; SINGLE: 19.0%, p 0.001) were observed after the MULTI and SINGLE protocols. A decrease in TLL was detected for both exercise protocols; however, the SINGLE protocol induced a greater decrease, compared to the MULTI protocol (-35 ± 11% vs -42 ± 5%, respectively; p = 0.026). A greater ITL for the MULTI was observed when compared to the SINGLE (12.1%; p 0.001). In conclusion, resistance training protocols with different exercise modalities seem to produce similar strength increases in resistance-trained men.
机译:运动类型是一种相关的电阻训练 - 可以操纵的变量,以便诱导肌肉力量的显着增加。本研究的目的是分析多关节对单关节电阻锻炼对最大强度的影响。训练有素的6个培训男性(年龄:23​​.1±4.4岁;体重:86.0±12.8;高度:培训经验:4.2±3.4岁)进行以下培训协议之一六周:多重,由只有多关节练习或单一,只有单联练习。然后将受试者提交3周的洗涤期,然后再提交给另外六周的其他议定书。采用线性周期化模型,其中外部载荷增加,重复范围每两周降低一次。卧式压力机(1RMBENCH)和蹲锻炼(1RMSQUAT)的最大动态强度测量了总负载(ΔTLL)和内部训练负载(ITL)的百分比变化。 1rmbench(多:10.8%,P <0.001;单次:5.5%,P <0.001)和1RMSquat(多:19.7%,P <0.001;单单:19.0%,P <0.001),在多个和单个协议。对练习协议检测到TLL的减少;然而,与多方案相比,单一方案诱导更大的减少(分别为-35±11%-42±5%; P = 0.026)。与单一相比(12.1%; P <0.001)相比,观察到多重的ITL。总之,具有不同运动方式的阻力训练方案似乎产生了耐受培训的男性的相似强度增加。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号