...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Emergency Medicine >Relationship between level of CPR training, self-reported skills, and actual manikin test performance an observational study
【24h】

Relationship between level of CPR training, self-reported skills, and actual manikin test performance an observational study

机译:CPR培训水平的关系,自我报告的技能和实际Manikin测试表现的观察研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills may influence out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes. We analyzed how the level of CPR training related to indicators of good CPR quality and also the relationship between self-reported skills and actual CPR performance. Two hundred thirty-seven persons trained in standardized BLS curricula were divided into three groups according to the level of training: group I (40 h basic first aid training), group II, and group III (96 h advanced first aid, group III had also some limited additional life support training courses). We recorded the participants real-life CPR experience and self-reported CPR skills, and then assessed selected CPR quality indicators on a manikin. The data were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression. Differences between groups were analyzed with ANOVA/MANOVA. Out of 237 participants, 125 had basic training (group I), 84 reported advanced training (group II), and 28 advanced training plus additional courses (group III). Group II and III had shorter start-up time, better compression depth and hand positioning, higher fraction of effective rescue ventilations, shorter hands-off time, and thus a higher chest compression fraction. Chest compression rate did not differ between groups. The participants in group I assessed their own skills and preparedness significantly lower than groups II and III both before and after the test. In addition, group III reported higher confidence in examining the critically ill patient and preparedness in doing CPR before the manikin test than both groups I and II. However, the observed differences between groups II and III in self-reported skills and preparedness were not statistically significant after the test. As expected, higher levels of BLS training correlated with better CPR quality. However, this study showed that ventilations and hands-on time were the components of CPR that were most affected by the level of training. Self-assessments of CPR ability correlated well to actual test performance and may have a role in probing CPR skills in students. The results may be important for BLS instructors and program developers.
机译:旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)技能的质量可能会影响医院心脏骤停(OHCA)结果。我们分析了CPR培训水平如何与良好的CPR质量指标以及自我报告技能与实际CPR绩效之间的关系。根据培训水平分为三组三十七人,根据培训水平分为三组:第I组(40小时基本急救培训),II集团和第三组(96 H高级急救,第三组)还有一些有限的额外生活支持培训课程)。我们录制了参与者现实生活CPR体验和自我报告的CPR技能,然后评估了Manikin的选定的CPR质量指标。通过多变量逻辑回归分析数据。通过ANOVA / MANOVA分析组之间的差异。在237名参与者中,125名有基础培训(第I集团),84次报告先进的培训(二世二组织),28次高级培训加上其他课程(第三组)。 II组和III初始启动时间较短,更好的压缩深度和手工定位,更高的有效救援通风,较短的减少时间,从而更高的胸部压缩分数。胸部压缩率在组之间没有区别。集团的参与者在测试之前和之后评估了他们自己的技能和准备,明显低于II和III组。此外,III族报告令人信心地对在Manikin试验之前在进行CPR之前检查危重病患者和准备的令人信心比I和II组。然而,在测试后,III族和III组的观察到差异在测试后没有统计学意义。正如预期的那样,更高水平的BLS训练与更好的CPR质量相关。然而,这项研究表明,通风和动手时间是CPR的组成部分,受到培训水平影响的CPR。对CPR能力的自我评估能力良好地与实际测试表现相比,可能在探索学生的CPR技能方面发挥作用。结果对于BLS教练和计划开发人员来说可能是重要的。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号