首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Doctoral Studies >Chair Agency, Chair Preparation, and Academic Supports in Educational Leadership Doctoral Programs in the United States
【24h】

Chair Agency, Chair Preparation, and Academic Supports in Educational Leadership Doctoral Programs in the United States

机译:主席,主席准备和教育领导博士博士计划在美国的学术支持

获取原文
       

摘要

Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this exploratory qualitative case study was to understand dissertation chair agency, chair preparation, and academic supports provided by experienced Educational Leadership Ed.D. dissertation chairs in the United States. Background: Previous research has identified attrition rates of 50-60 percent in education doctoral programs. This research helps identify the faculty profiles and academic supports provided by Educational Leadership faculty who have served on successful dissertation committees. Understanding these findings may help to improve retention and completion in other doctoral programs. Methodology: This was an exploratory qualitative case study. Ten doctoral faculty who have successfully chaired 419 Ed.D. Educational Leadership dissertations at accredited U.S. colleges and universities were interviewed. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Contribution: The findings from this study contribute to the body of knowledge on doctoral retention and dissertation completion by providing information on promising practices from the perspective of dissertation chairs. Findings: While successful dissertation chairs exhibited expertise as researchers, seven of the ten participants reported that they had limited training for chairing dissertations. Academic supports included coursework that was organized coherently with a focus on opportunities for substantive feedback, writing support and research methodology. Recommendations for Practitioners: Dissertation chairs should utilize their agency to ensure that the program has the proper resources to support doctoral education. This includes adequate writing support for graduate students, courses taught by faculty who are engaged in research and understand the requirements for completing a dissertation, and protecting faculty time so that they are able to provide students substantive feedback within coursework and at the dissertation phase. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers should continue to explore the causes of attrition in doctoral programs and identify specific actions that can be taken to improve program completion rates. Impact on Society: Increasingly U.S. institutions of higher learning are being called to validate their success and improve retention rates. Understanding the faculty profiles and academic supports utilized by successful doctoral faculty has the potential to improve retention and thereby increase completion rates and consequentially alleviate the stressors that ABD students experience. Future Research: Future research could focus on expanding the findings of this study by exploring the perspectives of faculty based on institution type and examining how socio-emotional factors such as student-student and faculty-student relationships are intentionally established in programs with high graduation rates.
机译:目标/目的:本探索性定性案例研究的目的是了解有经验教育领导埃德的学位主席,主席准备和学术支持。中国优秀硕士学位论文大家论文。背景:以前的研究已经确定了教育博士计划中的50-60%的消耗率。该研究有助于确定在成功的论文委员会提供的教育领导学院提供的教职员资本档案和学术支持。了解这些调查结果可能有助于改善其他博士计划的保留和完成。方法论:这是一个探索性定性案例研究。成功担任419 ED.D的十个博士教师。教育领导商学论众在认可美国和大学接受了采访。使用恒定的比较方法分析数据。贡献:本研究的调查结果有助于通过提供关于从学位论文椅的角度提供有前途的做法的信息来完成博士保留和论文完成。调查结果:虽然成功的论文椅子作为研究人员的专业知识,但十个参与者中有7人报告说,他们对董事培训培训有限。学术支持包括课程,该课程是致力于专注于实质性反馈,写作支持和研究方法的机会。从业者的建议:学位论文椅应利用其代理,以确保该计划有适当的资源来支持博士教育。这包括对研究生的充分性写作支持,由参与研究的教师教授的课程,了解完成论文的要求,并保护师时的要求,以便他们能够在课程中提供学生的实质性反馈和论文阶段。研究人员的建议:研究人员应继续探索博士计划中的消耗原因,并确定可以采取的具体行动,以提高计划完成率。对社会的影响:越来越多的高等院校正在被调用以验证他们的成功并提高保留率。了解成功博士学位利用的教师和学术支持有可能提高保留,从而增加完成率,并因此减轻了ABD学生经历的压力。未来的研究:未来的研究可以专注于通过探索基于机构类型的教师的观点来扩展本研究的调查结果,并考虑如何在高毕业率的计划中有意建立学生和教职员工关系等社会情感因素。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号