...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology >Differential efficacy between cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based therapies for chronic pain: Systematic review
【24h】

Differential efficacy between cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based therapies for chronic pain: Systematic review

机译:认知行为治疗与基于致力于慢性疼痛的疗法之间的差异疗效:系统评价

获取原文

摘要

Background/Objective:To assess the differential efficacy between mindfulness-based interventions and cognitive-behavioral Therapy (CBT) on chronic pain across medical conditions involving pain.Method:ProQuest, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Pubmed, and Embase databases were searched to identify randomized clinical trials. Measurements of mindfulness, pain, mood, and further miscellaneous measurements were included.Results:18 studies met the inclusion criteria (fibromyalgia,n= 5; low back pain,n= 5; headache/migraine,n= 4; non-specific chronic pain,n= 4). In fibromyalgia, mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR) was superior to the usual care and Fibroqol, in impact and symptoms. In low back pain, MBSR was superior to the usual care, but not to CBT, in physical functionality and pain intensity. There were no studies on differential efficacy between mindfulness and CBT for headache and non-specific chronic pain, but Mindfulness interventions were superior to the usual care in these syndromes.Conclusions:Mindfulness interventions are superior to usual cares in all diagnoses, but it is not possible to conclude their superiority over CBT. Comparisons between mindfulness interventions are scarce, with MBSR being the most studied. In central sensitization syndromes, variables associated with pain tend to improve with treatment. More research is needed to differentiate diagnosis and intervention.
机译:背景/目的:评估涉及痛苦的医疗条件的慢性疼痛的态度与认知行为治疗(CBT)的差异疗效。方法:Proquest,科学直接,谷歌学者,PubMed和Embase数据库被搜查识别随机临床试验。举行令人思想,疼痛,情绪和进一步的杂项测量。结果:18研究符合纳入标准(纤维肌痛,N = 5;低腰疼,n = 5;头痛/偏头痛,n = 4;非特异性慢性疼痛,n = 4)。在纤维肌痛中,基于谨慎的压力减少(MBSR)优于常规护理和纤维菌,影响和症状。在低腰疼痛中,MBSR优于通常的护理,但不能在物理功能和疼痛强度中进行CBT。没有关于头痛和非特异性慢性疼痛的差异疗效的研究,但介意干预措施优于这些综合征的常规护理。结论:谨慎的干预措施在所有诊断中优于常见的关注,但它不是可以在CBT结束他们的优越性。心灵干预措施的比较稀缺,MBSR是最受研究的。在中央致敏综合征中,与疼痛相关的变量倾向于改善治疗。需要更多的研究来区分诊断和干预。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号