...
首页> 外文期刊>Integrative cancer therapies. >A Prospective Outcomes Pilot Evaluation of Inspire Now: A Program for People with Lung Cancer
【24h】

A Prospective Outcomes Pilot Evaluation of Inspire Now: A Program for People with Lung Cancer

机译:目前的潜在成果试点评估Inspire:肺癌人员的计划

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in Canada, yet patients are often under-supported. A six-week program called Inspire Now, created to address unmet supportive care needs, was evaluated in this study. Feasibility and preliminary outcomes were assessed in order to inform future changes to the program. Objectives: (1) Assess the feasibility of the program and its evaluation; (2) pilot the collection of patient-reported outcomes; (3) identify outcomes that may be positively influenced; and (4) inform program modifications. Methods: Participants were recruited from the first session of Inspire Now for an observational pilot study. The primary outcome was feasibility. Secondary outcomes included within-person changes in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lung (FACT-L) and Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW), and program satisfaction and qualitative experiences of participants and facilitators through internally-developed questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Analysis was primarily descriptive, within person changes in FACT-L and MYCaW were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and qualitative data was assessed for common themes. Results: The program and its evaluation were feasible; 8 of 9 (89%) participants consented to the study, median attendance was 6 of 6 sessions (IQR 4.5-6), and questionnaire completion was 100% at baseline and 75% at follow-up. There were clinically meaningful improvements in MYCaW concern 1 (?1.2, 95% CI ?2.0 to ?0.4) and overall wellbeing (?0.9, 95% CI ?2.1 to 0.4). Seven of eight FACT-L sub-sections trended toward improvement, with absolute changes ranging from ?1.7 to 10.8%. Participant feedback was overwhelmingly positive; group support and social interactions were highly valued. Conclusions: The group intervention for people with lung cancer was feasible to both run and evaluate. Participants responded positively to the program. Findings will inform changes to future sessions and an analysis of multiple sessions is planned.
机译:背景:肺癌是加拿大癌症死亡率的主要原因,但患者经常被支持。在本研究中评估了一个六周的计划,以解决为解决未满足的支持性护理需求而创建的计划。评估可行性和初步结果,以便向未来的计划进行信息。目标:(1)评估计划的可行性及其评估; (2)试验患者报告的结果的集合; (3)确定可能积极影响的结果; (4)告知计划修改。方法:参与者是从第一届Inspire的Inspire招聘参与者进行了一个观察试点研究。主要结果是可行性的。次要结果包括在癌症治疗的功能评估中的次要结果 - 通过内部开发的问卷和半结构性访谈来衡量人们关注和培训人们的关注和福祉(MICCAW),以及参与者和促进者的节目满意度和定性经验。分析主要是描述性的,在人类的情况下,使用Wilcoxon签名的秩序进行分析-L和Mycaw的Mycaw,并评估了共同主题的定性数据。结果:该计划及其评估是可行的;第9个(89%)参与者同意这项研究的参与者,中位数出席者为6个会议(IQR 4.5-6)中的6项,并且问卷完成在基线100%,随访时间为75%。 Mycaw涉及1(?1.2,95%CI?2.0至0.4)和整体阱(?0.9,95%CI?2.1至0.4)。八个事实-l子部分遍及改善,绝对变化从?1.7到10.8%。参与者的反馈绝大多数是积极的;集团支持和社会互动受到高度重视。结论:对肺癌人民的群体干预对于运行和评估是可行的。参与者积极回应该计划。调查结果将对未来会话的更改提供信息,并计划分析多个会话。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号