...
首页> 外文期刊>Integrative cancer therapies. >Effects of Nonpharmacological Interventions in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
【24h】

Effects of Nonpharmacological Interventions in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

机译:非武装干预在化疗诱导的周围神经病变的影响:系统评价概述和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the prevalent and disabling side effects of cancer treatment. However, management strategies for CIPN currently remain elusive, with treatment restricted to neuropathic pain medications, supportive care, and chemotherapy dosing adjustments. This overview explores evidence on the potential benefits and safety of nonpharmacological interventions in preventing and treating CIPN in cancer patients. Methods: Seven databases were searched for systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The methodological quality of the selected reviews was assessed by AMSTAR 2, and the quality of evidence was judged by GRADE. Twenty-eight systematic reviews were considered eligible for this review. Results: It was found that nonpharmacological interventions (acupuncture, exercise, herbal medicine, nutritional supplements) provided potential benefits for patients with CIPN. Furthermore, Chinese herbal medicine, administered orally or externally, significantly prevented and/or relieved the incidence and severity of CIPN in comparison to control groups (no additional treatment, placebo, and conventional western medicine). However, the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were compromised by the inconsistencies and imprecision of included studies. The main concerns regarding the quality of systematic reviews included the lack of sufficiently rigorous a priori protocols, and the lack of protocol registration adopted in the included studies. Conclusions: Though looking across reviews, Chinese herbal medicine appear generally effective in CIPN, uncertainty remains about the effects of many other nonpharmacological interventions. The evidence on what works was particularly compromised by reporting and methodological limitations, which requires further investigation to be more certain of their effects.
机译:介绍:化学疗法诱导的周围神经病变(CIPN)是癌症治疗的普遍存存副作用之一。然而,CIPN的管理策略目前仍然难以捉摸,治疗受到神经性疼痛药物,支持性护理和化疗给药调整。该概述探讨了关于在癌症患者中预防和治疗CIPN的临时干预措施潜在益处和安全的证据。方法:搜索七个数据库,用于随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价。由Amstar 2评估所选审查的方法论质量,并按成绩判断证据质量。二十八次系统评价被认为有资格进行此评论。结果:发现非武装干预(针灸,运动,草药,营养补充剂)为CIPN患者提供了潜在的益处。此外,与对照组(无额外的治疗,安慰剂和常规西医)相比,中草药(外部施用口服或外部,显着预防和/或缓解CIPN的发病率和严重程度。但是,建议的证据和实力的质量受到包括研究的不一致和不确定的损害。关于系统评论质量的主要担忧包括缺乏足够严格的先验议定书,并在内的研究中通过了缺乏议定书注册。结论:虽然看着评论,但中草药在CIPN中似乎普遍有效,但不确定性仍然是许多其他非药物干预措施的影响。有关作品的证据是通过报告和方法的限制特别损害,这需要进一步调查更为某种效果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号