...
首页> 外文期刊>Innovation in aging. >Life Course Socioeconomic Status and Late-Life Cognition and Cognitive Decline in the Rush Memory and Aging Project
【24h】

Life Course Socioeconomic Status and Late-Life Cognition and Cognitive Decline in the Rush Memory and Aging Project

机译:鲁莽记忆和老化项目的生命课程社会经济地位与晚期认知和认知下降

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract The relationships among life course socioeconomic status (SES) measures with later life cognition and cognitive decline are unclear. We test the hypothesis that life-course SES is associated with late life level of cognition and rate of cognitive decline. The Rush Memory and Aging Project enrolled 1,864 dementia-free people aged ≥65 years between 1994 – 2018. Participants reported early life (parental education, number of siblings, and childhood financial need), mid-life (income at 40 years), and late life (baseline income) SES. Global cognitive function is a composite of 19 neuropsychological tests, administered annually. We utilized marginal structural models to assess the effect of SES (dichotomized at the median) at three life-course stages on late life global cognitive function and decline. We calculated inverse probability weights to adjust for socio-demographic confounders at each life-course stage. A total 1,063 participants had all relevant variables. Average follow-up was 4.4 years, and mean baseline age was 80.4 years. Most respondents were non-Hispanic white (89.7%) and female (74.1%). In the fully adjusted model, high childhood SES (coefficient 0.10; 95% CI 0.01, 0.20) and high late-life SES were associated with higher cognition intercept (coefficient 0.21; 95% CI 0.09, 0.32). High mid-life SES was associated with slower rate of cognitive decline (coefficient 0.02; 95% CI 0.001, 0.05). Childhood and late-life SES measures were not related to cognitive decline. Childhood and adult SES may reflect processes in building cognitive capacity, while midlife SES may reflect cognition maintenance. Interventions relating to SES across the life-course may benefit later life cognition.
机译:摘要利用后续生命认知和认知下降的生活课程社会经济地位(SES)措施之间的关系尚不清楚。我们测试了生命课程SE与认知的后期生活水平与认知率下降相关的假设。匆忙记忆和老化项目招收了1,864岁的痴呆症患者≥65岁,1994年至2018年之间。参与者报告了早期生命(父母教育,兄弟姐妹数量和童年财务需求),中生(40岁的收入),以及晚期生活(基线收入)SES。全球认知功能是每年施用19个神经心理学测试的复合材料。我们利用边缘结构模型来评估SES(中位数在中位数)的效果,以三个生命课程阶段对晚期生命全球认知功能和下降。我们计算了对每个生命课程阶段的社会人口剧与的逆概率权重。共有1,063名参与者具有所有相关变量。平均随访时间为4.4岁,而平均基线年龄为80.4岁。大多数受访者是非西班牙裔(89.7%)和女性(74.1%)。在完全调整的模型中,高儿童SES(系数0.10; 95%CI 0.01,0.20)和高级晚期SES与更高的认知截距(系数0.21; 95%CI 0.09,0.32)相关。高中寿命与认知下降速度较慢(系数0.02; 95%CI 0.001,0.05)相关。童年和后期的SES措施与认知下降无关。童年和成年人可能会反映建立认知能力的过程,而中年SE可能反映了认知维护。与生命课程有关的干预措施可能会使稍后的生命认知受益。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号