...
首页> 外文期刊>Innovation in aging. >Last Place of Care and End-of-Life Quality of Life in the United States: Evidence From a National Representative Data Set
【24h】

Last Place of Care and End-of-Life Quality of Life in the United States: Evidence From a National Representative Data Set

机译:美国的最后一名护理和终身生活质量:来自国家代表数据集的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background: Quality of life (QoL) during last stage of life has raised expanded interests as an important aspect of person-centered care. Last place of care (LPC), refer to the last place decedents received their formal end-of-life care (EOLC), has been identified as a key indicator of older adults’ end-of-life QoL, but the relationship was understudied. This study explores the association between LPC and end-of-life QoL among American older adults. Methods: Data used seven waves of Last Month of Life data with a total sample of 3068 Medicare decedents in NHATS. Outcome is end-of-life QoL assessed by eleven measures on four domains: pain and symptoms management (SP), quality of healthcare encounter (HE), person-centered care (PC), and overall quality of care (QC). LPC was categorized into home, hospital, nursing home, and residential hospice. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to examine the relationship with covariates. Results: LPC varied by most demographic characteristics, except immigration status and education. Older adults whose LPC is hospital, compared to those who had home-care, were less likely to have great experiences on HE, PC, and QC. People dying at nursing homes are more likely to receive care meeting their dyspnea and spiritual needs. Residential hospice is negatively related to respected care, clear coordination, and keeping family informed, but are more likely to provide PS and spiritual care. Discussion: Home-based end-of-life care has certain advantages but still has room to improve on SP and religious concerns. Hospitals should keep reforming their service delivery structure to improve patients’ QoL.
机译:摘要背景:生命的最后阶段的生活质量(QOL)提出了扩展的兴趣作为以人为本的护理的重要方面。最后的护理地点(LPC),参考最后一个Degenent接受了正式终身护理(EOLC),已被确定为老年人的寿命终身QOL的关键指标,但这种关系被解读。本研究探讨了LPC与美国老年人中LED终生QOL之间的关联。方法:数据使用了七波的寿命数据的七波,并在NHATS中具有3068家Medicare Defenent的总样本。结果是在四个域的11个措施评估的寿命QOL:疼痛和症状管理(SP),医疗保健质量(他),以人为本的护理(PC)和整体护理质量(QC)。 LPC分为家庭,医院,养老院和住院医察局。多变量逻辑回归分析用于检查与协变的关系。结果:除移民身份和教育外,LPC大多数人口统计特征都多样化。与家庭护理的人相比,LPC为医院的老年人不太可能对他,PC和QC有很大的经验。在护理家园中死亡的人更有可能接受关注他们的呼吸困难和精神需求。住院临终关怀与尊重的护理,清晰的协调和保持家庭通知,但更有可能提供PS和精神护理。讨论:家庭终身关怀具有一定的优势,但仍有改善SP和宗教关注的空间。医院应继续改革他们的服务交付结构,以改善患者的QoL。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号