首页> 外文期刊>Innovation in aging. >Equivalent Pathways? Comparison of Job History for High School Graduates Versus GED Recipients
【24h】

Equivalent Pathways? Comparison of Job History for High School Graduates Versus GED Recipients

机译:等同的途径?高中毕业生与GED收件人的工作历史比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Successful integration into the paid labor market serves as a critical milestone to adulthood. Yet, this school-to-work transition has become harder to reach due to the increasing precarity in the youth labor market. Using data from the NLSY97, this study compares the job histories of young adults whose terminal education credentials are high school diploma versus GED. I conducted sequence analysis of school-to-work states from age 16 to 30 between these two education groups. Findings show that GED holders are more likely to be exposed to enduring negative labor force status (e.g., periods of unemployment) than the high school graduates. Over half of the GED recipients experience precarious early career characterized by interruptions and long-term inactivity. Despite being “equivalent” to a high school diploma, the GED diploma does not translate into the same opportunity structure as the high school degree, launching a cumulative disadvantage process in the early life course.
机译:摘要成功融入付费劳动力市场是成年期的关键里程碑。然而,由于青年劳动力市场的强制性越来越高,这一学校工作过渡已经变得越来越难以达到。本研究使用来自NLSY97的数据,比较了终端教育凭证是高中文凭与GED的年轻成年人的作业历史。我在这两个教育团体之间从16到30岁开始对学校与工作状态进行序列分析。调查结果表明,GED持有人更有可能被暴露于持久的负劳动力状态(例如,失业期)而不是高中毕业生。超过一半的GED接受者体验了危险的早期职业,其特征在于中断和长期不活动。尽管对高中文凭“相当”,但GED文凭并没有转化为同一机会结构,作为高中学位,在早期生命过程中发动累积劣势过程。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号