首页> 外文期刊>Innovation in aging. >Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury?
【24h】

Driving Private Vehicles in Later Life: Necessity or Luxury?

机译:在后期生活中驾驶私人车辆:必要性或奢侈品?

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract The automobile industry in South Korea has rapidly expanded for the last half century. The current generation of older adults is the first generation that has experienced mass car ownership and also faced challenges related to driving cessation due to geriatric syndromes. This study aimed to explore diversity in reasons for driving private vehicles among Korean older adults. Data came from a nationally representative survey on adults aged 65 years and older conducted in August, 2019 (N=1,500; women 57.1%). One out of four respondents (24.5%) reported driving, and the current drivers were categorized into four groups by primary reason for driving: (a) for convenience, (b) for caregiving, (c) for survival (due to the lack of public transport) and (d) for living (i.e. taxi or bus driver). The results showed that current drivers were more likely to be men, younger and more educated compared to non-drivers. Conspicuously, those who reported driving for their family members with mobility needs were the second largest group after those who reported driving for convenience such as for grocery shopping (34.6% and 43.6%, respectively). The results of multinomial logistic regression model showed that older age, living in rural areas and poorer self-rated health were associated with driving for survival as compared to driving for convenience. About the odds of driving for caregiving compared to driving for convenience were higher for those married and living with their spouse than for those not-married. The results imply the importance of considering diversity in developing public policies for older drivers.
机译:摘要韩国汽车工业在过去半个世纪迅速扩大。目前的老年人的一代是第一代,拥有群众汽车所有权,也面临由于老年综合征导致的驾驶戒烟有关的挑战。本研究旨在探讨韩国老年人驾驶私人车辆的原因的多样性。数据来自2019年8月(n = 1,500名)的65岁及以上成年人的全国代表性调查(n = 1,500;女性57.1%)。四个受访者(24.5%)报告的驾驶中有一项驾驶,目前的司机按照驾驶的主要原因分为四组:(a)为方便起见,(b)用于护理,(c)存活(由于缺乏公共交通工具)和(d)生活(即出租车或公共汽车司机)。结果表明,与非司机相比,目前的司机更有可能是男性,更年轻,更接受教育。显着的是,那些报告为其家庭成员驾驶的人,他们的家庭成员是第二大群体,后者报告为杂货店购物(分别为34.6%和43.6%)。多项逻辑回归模型的结果表明,与方便驾驶相比,历史较大的年龄,生活在农村地区和自我评价的健康状况较差的驾驶有关。关于为便利性的驾驶而驾驶的驾驶的几率更高,对于那些与他们的配偶一起生活而不是那些未婚的人更高。结果意味着考虑多样性在制定旧驾驶员的公共政策方面的重要性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号